Didn’t the crime happen on September 19th, a Thursday? If so, wouldn’t his daughter theoretically have been in school? If why did he think it would make a difference if he called on his phone vs. the judges’s? Were they not on speaking terms? Usually class has a no phone policy which may explain why she didn’t pick up. Why did he expect her too in such a short amount of time if she was school. If he really needed her to answer did he try to text her to say she really needed her to pick up? Did he try the school? Or ask his wife to ask her to get through to their daughter?
What if his daughter wasn’t at school? Did he even know where she was or whereabouts? Is that why he mentioned a kidnapping? What his mental state of mind at the time? As opposed to a kidnapping did something happen or occur that perhaps led to a physical separation between him and wife and daughter? Did they leave the home of their own volition and were not on speaking terms with him nor did they inform him of where they had gone? What if his mentally due to illness, lack of sleep or stress rather than perceive his family left of their own will he suffers the delusion or paranoia that they were taken from him and thinks other at fault? Did this delusion or thought cause him to suspect the judge because they and their families were close and he was someone with power?
The NPR article mentioned that he seemed altered mentally and emotionally as early as the Monday before during the deposition. Court TV hypothesized his change in demeanor was caused by the stress due to the deposition itself but what if something happens before that and at home?
Also, I wonder if before the shooting if he tried to contact his wife too? It seems his mindset evolved around both of them based on his statement they were trying to kidnap his wife and daughter.
Just my opinion but hypothetically if this horrific murder was motivated by committing a crime or doing something inappropriate and illegal with MS’ daughter wouldn’t he had made a statement more along those lines, like ‘he touched my daughter’ or ‘he was pedophile’ or ‘that pervert had it coming’, rather than allude to a kidnapping that threatened not just his daughter but wife too? His lawyer said MS committed a crime of passion and emotional disturbance. If so, I imagine MS probably wouldn’t be able to help but express to the arresting officer that his fellow friend and judge who everyone looked up had the audacity to assault or prey upon his beloved daughter. Why then mention a supposed kidnapping unless he thought, whether real or not, one was involved and the motivator for the such a horrible murder?
And then again, his daughter claims she wasn’t sexually assaulted by the judge and unless LE or the court say differently I presently no reason not to believe her.
Is did mental illness or some type of delusion or paranoia play a role? Unlike in the moments and days after the murder, he seemed to express remorse or at least show emotion via looking down and seeming to wipe away tears when the video played the preliminary hearing. Does this indicate a change in mental state or whatever mindset or thoughts he had towards the victim? Does he still feel or carry himself as justified?
Just spitballing my thoughts/sharing my opinions