RANCH
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 18,399
- Reaction score
- 40,138
What is the battle of the songs about?I read a comment earlier today that the Inside Edition car pic/video battle of the songs was 8 years ago!
What is the battle of the songs about?I read a comment earlier today that the Inside Edition car pic/video battle of the songs was 8 years ago!
yeah, which is intriguing in itself as the lawsuit I shared has him and one of his deputies named and (allegedly) doing the exact opposite of that. Claims that he knew of abuse taking place in the Judgeme chambers and failed to investigate itMaybe as an upholder of the law, he somehow saw it as his right to dispense justice.
Or else his feet have slipped right out of his stirrups.Maybe as an upholder of the law, he somehow saw it as his right to dispense justice.
Finally!!! It is out there.Yeah, so there’s our motive. Not specifically, but related to something with the daughter.
It does jibe with the rumors.
I don't think "it" is out there. I doubt it is going to turn out to be what the rumors are.Finally!!! It is out there.
I don't think there's any justification for execution, but stating that Stines "should have known" about the SA is squirrelly. He definitely should have known, but without proof that he witnessed something or someone told him, it's pretty irrelevant. JMO.The complaint (and amended complaint) in the lawsuit where 2 individuals were suing him (Stines) & one of his deputies is a really wild read. I’m attaching two portions of it, but this document can be found on PACER or Court listener by searching the Case number of 7:22-cv-00007-REW-EBA
“During these meetings Defendant Fields' behavior escalated from flirtatious comments to forcible kissing, to oral sex, to intercourse with Sabrina, all of which
occurred at the Letcher County Courthouse after hours, in Judge Mullins' Chambers (hereinafter the "sexual abuse").” -and-
“Upon information and belief Defendant Fields and other Letcher County Deputy
Sheriffs were aware of these allegations related to Sabrina in early December 2021. Upon information and belief Defendant Stines knew or should have known about these allegations related to Sabrina on or before early December 2021.”
I haven’t a clue how these allegations could be connecting to the “kidnap” comment shared in the hearing today though. JMOO.
Most governments (local, city, state) offer pension plans. Set up a little differently than traditional pensions, you have a guaranteed payment after 5 years of service and you’re fully vested and can retire after 20 years. I currently work for a large city Human Services office and I (thankfully) have a pension plan and so do all full time employees. In the state of Virginia, I am not sure about all states, you can transfer your years of service between any government agency.I doubt he has a pension. The County probably offers a percentage match for a 401k. He listed a 401k as an asset.
Moo
There are no metal detectors at the courthouse where this occurred.I do know for a fact that if you have to go to a county office that is inside a courthouse building, you do have to go through the metal detectors.
I had to do this when I had to go to the courthouse to change the real estate ownership on property tax records.
The articles said they have 3 phones in custody and are analyzing them regarding this case. My guess:I am more than concerned about the investigators within the KSP. ETA: They should have taken the daughter's phone.
jmo
It really doesn't matter whether he knew or not or if he even guarded the door. He is NOT being sued personally. He is being sued in his official capacity. That is stated right in the caption of the complaint. At worst he could have been removed from office for misfeasance and that is a length he process. He was planning to retire anyway and was not running for re-election.He really had no skin in the game so he had nothing to worry about. Any "anger" he had at the deposition probably had more to do with seeing an obvious money grab on county finances.I don't think there's any justification for execution, but stating that Stines "should have known" about the SA is squirrelly. He definitely should have known, but without proof that he witnessed something or someone told him, it's pretty irrelevant. JMO.
No they have a cell phone from some one who who turned it over to them having over heard part of a lunch at the courthouse that day conversation .The articles said they have 3 phones in custody and are analyzing them regarding this case. My guess:
1. Sheriff’s
2. Judge’s
3. Sheriff’s UNDERAGE high school daughter
MOO
Thanks for clarifying!No they have a cell phone from some one who who turned it over to them having over heard part of a lunch at the courthouse that day conversation .
What good would it do to seize the daughter's phone? They would not be able to get a search warrant on it because she is not suspected of a crime. She also told them what the content of her conversations with the judge were. That was stated in open court today.IMO The only reason for them not having taken daughter’s phone:
Mother and daughter were able to corroborate the fact they had been speaking to Mullins about Stine’s declining mental health,, etc. and perhaps he had been advising them as a longtime family friend, to leave him.
Supporting him in court because they still love him is not out of the question.
jmo