Yes, like whatever it was, he got it done.defendant still had a determined look in his eyes sitting in that courtroom today
Yes, like whatever it was, he got it done.defendant still had a determined look in his eyes sitting in that courtroom today
I don't think the sheriff asked to speak with the judge privately in his chambers. The judge seems to have offered that space for the conversation. jmoSo the judge and sheriff have lunch together. Been best buddies for years. Both pillars of the community. Apparently, sheriff asked to speak with the judge in his chambers saying he needed to discuss something with him. The two men had a dispute about what? Cell phones were exchanged? That followed with gunshots being heard and the sheriff surrendering without incident.
Why would someone be so willing to give up their freedom so quickly - unless it's personal?
This sounds a lot like rage and very personal. Did sheriff see something that triggered the crime on the judge’s phone? Seeing minor daughter’s phone number on sheriff’s phone and dialing phone number is a red flag.
All jmo
"She also told them what the content of her conversations with the judge were. That was stated in open court today."What good would it do to seize the daughter's phone? They would not be able to get a search warrant on it because she is not suspected of a crime. She also told them what the content of her conversations with the judge were. That was stated in open court today.
If this is, indeed, the scenario, I wonder what the son's place in all this is. MOO MOO MOOBINGO! That's exactly what I think happened.
We have seen how hot tempered Stine is. Cold Stone temper---ate a quiet lunch with him then shot his life long friend 8 times at close range, then calmly walked away.
What could make him so extremely angry?
What if his wife was trying to leave him but was afraid for her and her daughter's safety? She couldn't just call the police because that would be of no help. So she reached out to her family friend for help----got the Judge to sign a Protective Order and they all exchanged numbers in case of emergency, if they needed help. The judge could get LE to go help with his one phone call, where the wife or daughter might be ignored if they called about an abusive Sheriff.
If Stine found out about the alleged protective order and his wife's plan to leave, he'd be furious at his friend for siding with his wife and daughter.
[A protective order is issued during the court process to protect the alleged victim in domestic violence cases. While the case is pending, a judge will order you stay away from the victim and to stop contacting them.]
Your post reminds me of the Luzerne County, PA “Kids for Cash” scandal.Stines is a large man, some reports citing his weight in excess of 300#. I've wondered if he started taking diet Rx or the non FDA compounds which may have triggered something unintended. One need not go far to read the negatives of the latest miracle drugs to the stars.
Just the same, I'm also wondering about Judge Mullins and his good deeds with recovery versus jail. Recent reports are that the very same Addition Recover Centers (ARC), a for profit organization frequented by inmates sentenced my Mullins (transportation by Stines) is under Federal Investigation for Insurance fraud.
I'm seeing some familiar names previously reported in this case including the Attorney General and the KY Governor. The founder of ARC, Tim Robinson -- a lawyer and recovered alcoholic who started the company that became ARC in 2010, has emerged as a politically well-connected figure and major political donor.
IMO, it would not be shocking to learn Judge Mullins was receiving kickbacks for sending addicts to ARC verus sentencing then to jail, and justify this as a win-win!
I dunno... perhaps if the most powerful politcos in the state were trying to get to Stines to cover for Mullins (in this federal investigation) by threatening Stines family, perhaps this might cause some bullets to fly Mullins way.
Just speculating after realizing things in KY are not always as what they seem... MOO
FBI investigating alleged fraud at Addiction Recovery Care
No charges have been brought against ARC at this time.www.wkyt.com
Addiction recovery company under FBI investigation reducing staff, blames reimbursement cuts • Kentucky Lantern
Kentucky’s largest provider of drug and alcohol treatment is cutting staff and restructuring services, citing significant cuts in Medicaid reimbursement.kentuckylantern.com
Yes, like whatever it was, he got it done.
snippedSnipped
appears to show Stines, a hulking man who stands 6’4” and weighs more than 300 pounds, firing on Mullins as he sits at his desk with his left hand up.
Perhaps it was something that was going to expose Stine. IMOSo the judge and sheriff have lunch together. Been best buddies for years. Both pillars of the community. Apparently, sheriff asked to speak with the judge in his chambers saying he needed to discuss something with him. The two men had a dispute about what? Cell phones were exchanged? That followed with gunshots being heard and the sheriff surrendering without incident.
Why would someone be so willing to give up their freedom so quickly - unless it's personal?
This sounds a lot like rage and very personal. Did sheriff see something that triggered the crime on the judge’s phone? Seeing minor daughter’s phone number on sheriff’s phone and dialing phone number is a red flag.
All jmo
Allabouttrial, this represents a lot of work on your behalf. Very well done! Thank you so much for providing this valuable written account for everyone. Very, very well done!Erm I apologise in advance for the length....
(snipped)
That doesn't make sense to me, imoo. In your scenario, why would that wife who is so terrified of her husband, try to see him in jail and sit mere feet away from him in court?BINGO! That's exactly what I think happened.
We have seen how hot tempered Stine is. Cold Stone temper---ate a quiet lunch with him then shot his life long friend 8 times at close range, then calmly walked away.
What could make him so extremely angry?
What if his wife was trying to leave him but was afraid for her and her daughter's safety? She couldn't just call the police because that would be of no help. So she reached out to her family friend for help----got the Judge to sign a Protective Order and they all exchanged numbers in case of emergency, if they needed help. The judge could get LE to go help with his one phone call, where the wife or daughter might be ignored if they called about an abusive Sheriff.
If Stine found out about the alleged protective order and his wife's plan to leave, he'd be furious at his friend for siding with his wife and daughter.
[A protective order is issued during the court process to protect the alleged victim in domestic violence cases. While the case is pending, a judge will order you stay away from the victim and to stop contacting them.]
In the scope of investigating Mikey Stines, they can obtain a warrant to obtain evidence against him. If they have probable cause to believe that evidence of that crime exists on a third party device, they can obtain a warrant to obtain that information. Her being a minor is irrelevant.With all due respect, they only have scope to investigate Mickey Stines at this point. They can seize the judge's phone because he is a dead victim. They can seize the sheriff's phone after arrest. But invading the privacy of a minor who is not suspected of a crime seems like a huge stretch and I doubt a judge would authorize a search warrant unless something from the searches of the judges or sheriff's phones turns up something to make a search of Lila's phone important (to prosecution or defense). The defense MAY be able to get a warrant for the daughter's and wife's phones for exculpatory information but I think that is a stretch as well.
I mentioned that I am FB friends with someone who is friends with the judge's sister. Can my phone be seized because that connections means they suspect I was in contact with the judge or maybe the underage daughter?
Things can only stretch so far!
Having "reason to believe" is not enough for a warrant
Arg! I wish the mountain eagle wasn't paywalled!Snipped
appears to show Stines, a hulking man who stands 6’4” and weighs more than 300 pounds, firing on Mullins as he sits at his desk with his left hand up.
Video shows the moment a Kentucky judge was shot to death
People in the courtroom wept as the footage was shown during a preliminary hearing for former Sheriff Shawn “Mickey” Stines, who is charged with first-degree murder.www.wlrn.org
The plaintiff and her two attorneys said Stines seemed agitated during the deposition, often turning to his attorney for guidance and asking for frequent breaks. The day after the deposition, Stines — who usually returned press calls promptly — took many hours to get back to a reporter about a fatal accident, according to The Mountain Eagle, Letcher’s weekly newspaper. Stines told the newspaper that he’d “told everyone at the sheriff’s office not to say anything to anyone until he returned.”
Stines also told the newspaper that he had lost 40 pounds in the past two weeks and did not know why.
this bit by defense here is funny to me. Not ha ha funny but . . . defense attorney trying to suggest that there is some sort of extreme emotional upset that caused the sheriff to shoot the judge and he should only be tried for manslaughter but does not elicit or present any testimony that suggests an extreme upset existed. Nice try buddy but so far murder 1 seems more appropriate. If you want to show us something that suggests otherwise we are all anxious to see/hear it.DEFENSE - Murder under our statute, as the court knows, I'm not telling you anything you don't know, but if there is an issue as to extreme emotional disturbance, then there has to be some evidence that would rebut that, and specifically when I asked the witness today, (inaudible) evidence to rebut that this occurred as a direct result in the moment, this observation (inaudible) and I get it, it's just probable cause but I think they've established probable cause for manslaughter 1st but not murder. I've heard nothing that indicates that this is not an example of an extreme emotional disturbance relative to the (inaudible), any rate judge, respectively, I understand the court's previous ruling but I did want to address that.
PROSECUTOR - (inaudible) defense presented to this court today that the Judge was intentionally shot and killed.. shot multiple times by the Sheriff and there's probable cause to (inaudible).
JUDGE - Yeah I agree there's probable cause to proceed with the murder.
No. The delay in responding to a reporter regarding that accident, was something that was out of the ordinary for Stines.Arg! I wish the mountain eagle wasn't paywalled!
Is the "fatal accident" related?