Jolynna
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2006
- Messages
- 4,788
- Reaction score
- 1,996
It creates NO suspicion as long as nothing ties RK to association with any Anthony.Does this create suspicion in any of your minds?
To me it is a big nothing. I am not excited about it nor does it move me in any way.
It almost adds to the comedic element of this case. Another poster posted on the other thread that "another clown just squeezed out of the car" and I think that is a perfect analogy.
Ideally only those with "Mother Theresa" pasts would stumble across evidence. But, even if JK is a one-time "Jack the Ripper" as long as JK didn't assist the killer and wasn't aiding her, his past is "what it is".
Really, really bad guys (which I do NOT believe RK is) are called as witnesses all the time. RK just has to say why he was in the area and made the phone calls in August plus what he found the day he stumbled over Caylee's skull.
He can only be impeached on that limited scope and nothing else can even be brought up unless the defense can prove to a judge they have information that relates to *this* case. (Or the prosecutor accidently opens a door)
JMO