Found Deceased KS - Lucas Hernandez, 5, Wichita, 17 Feb 2018 #9 *Arrest*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
While her confidence and the idea that he has been missing much longer than reported has me thinking maybe he IS far away, Tim's continued searching and assurance that he's not stopping has me thinking there's still a good chance that he's close by. He knows what LE has and can go anywhere in the country. I think if it was more probable that Lucas was in OK (for example), they would just pack up and move the search that way. Of course they may not want to leave any stone unturned locally first, but I don't believe Tim and Co is in the business of false hope and wasting time. He's only going to search places that are possible /probable and he does have a gift for sure.
I just have to keep holding onto the hope that he's findable nearby.
 
Sorry yes egs word that he was wearing a pull up.... Just because she makes sure to mention it every chance she can for some reason
Thanks for linking the reference to drug use for me. I apologize, thought it was common knowledge. If I need to edit my post and remove it, I will. I also need to state again that all those are just my jumbled thoughts coming out of my confused brain. All opinion. I'll delete if it's easier.
 
I hope this doesn’t sound too crazy, and given that I’ve thought of it I can’t imagine that LE hasn’t. Considering EG grew up in Andover this occurred to me. I used to drive to Andover from Wichita 5 days a week, taking my son to school. To avoid traffic and construction on Kellogg, I’ve driven every way to Andover that you can go I think. Harry St to Andover Rd, at the right time of day, is almost eerie it’s so deserted. Especially past Webb. There’s lots of places someone could stop off and go down a culvert or into the woods.
There’s other ways too that are quiet and have dense wooded areas but Harry just pops out at me. Harry St isn’t far from their new house. Also, It’s quite a ...calming drive for lack of a better description. I don’t know if that’s an area that is included on any search.
 
FLA asked us to focus on Feb 16-17. So let's do this.

LE and TES are honed in on parks. I wonder if she was out making a drug deal (selling?) or a hook-up or something, and something happened to Lucas while out there. At that same time, the baby was also compromised. She could be caught doing illegal drugs, or cheating on her husband, or some other thing that she is ashamed of or fearful will cause her to lose some type of relationship.... Just thinking out loud...

Maybe Lucas had been napping at home in a pull up and she just threw him n the baby into the car without changing / dressing them? Pull up would fit that scenario (if true) plus park and child endangerment.

Great thought. Keep going.
And good idea on the camera, too, Busy. They do have to have enough evidence for an arrest warrant and everything you said makes perfect sense.
 
Last thread there was discussion about Sedgwick County Park and access at dark. The main park is gated off, but this parking lot backs right up to a wooded area next to the park. If Sedgwick County Park is a place people are concerned about, a search might be needed here. 537E46FA-4D3B-484E-A1E6-2871A2206E6E.jpeg
 
@FLA
From previous thread
There was an image someone had posted on one of the threads that showed date and time of endangering and it had at the top (CCTV).
I’m not sure who posted it, does anyone else remember this?
It also helped us understand the 4-6timeframe on that Friday prior to Lucas being reported missing.
 
FLA asked us to focus on Feb 16-17. So let's do this.

LE and TES are honed in on parks. I wonder if she was out making a drug deal or a hook-up or something, and something happened to Lucas while out there. At that same time, the baby was also compromised. She could be caught doing illegal drugs, or cheating in her husband, or some other thing that she is ashamed of or fearful will cause her to lose some type of relationship.... Just thinking out loud...

I went back to thread #1 again. This video was posted very early on. (Post 439)
Quote Originally Posted by margarita25 View Post
Search continues in Kansas for missing 5-year -old boy
Updated: Feb 18, 2018 08:38 PM MST
http://www.kyma.com/news/national-wo...-boy/703882044
*video at link

(Same video has been sent out to and published on various msm outlets 32 minutes ago it seems, simultaneously)


The person speaking as though she was there looking for Lucas was identified as a relative of stepmom a couple posts later by FLA.

<modsnip>

http://www.kyma.com/news/national-w...in-kansas-for-missing-5year-old-boy/703882044

<modsnip>
 
Please remove if I'm out of line - but if they arrested her and took her phone as evidence, they would be able to search through it and track her locations. For example, my phone is operated through my Google account and it tracks everywhere I went. At the end of any day, I can pull up the map and it will show my driving route, every stop I've made and how long I stopped. I'm curious if this is how they've chosen to focus their searches in the places they have. Just speculating out loud.
 
Ugh, Thread 9 already. I didn't even get through reading thread 8, but I'm still here, praying for Lucas to be found soon. :please:
 
What and when is the LAST thing that happened before she reported Lucas missing that we KNOW of?
 
IMO. Lucas was gone long before the day she reported it.

Per the VI, saying it without saying it, Lucas was last seen by someone as late as Friday before he was reported missing on Sat. She said in the last thread when I asked her regarding a time line she said she couldn't say when Lucas was last seen but advised us to focus on Late Friday and Saturday.
 
I thought about LilTexans comment on the other thread, "we should find him a quarter of a mile away." I started thinking about how she moved from one house to next. She would stay on the residential streets and definitely knows the old area better than the new. Can anyone take a look at these "close to home" areas?

Pic 1. Path from one house ton another
2. Culvert at East Lincoln and Fabrique
3. See if there is a dumpster in front of Grazas supermarket on Lincoln. Its not in this pic, but it was on Google maps.
4. Culvert st E Lincoln and South Towne

More on next post
7ed2e1f40542aacce04553d2ef58e32e.jpg
8eafe1cb30f8b2e60cce618c2554055b.jpg
60dfb09a216b8cf3cc6e517b59b3fcc4.jpg
fd8e0acd4d386cf19a53003c3987baa1.jpg


Sent from my P00I using Tapatalk
 
They didn't arrest her on drug charges so they didn't find drugs at house and I would not think they would arrest her on child endangerment charges based on someone giving LE information that says I saw her and the kids on the 16th and she was wasted on drugs. They have to have some kind of evidence, like her and children on camera in a store indicating she was under the influence of something. IMO

I don't post much so forgive me if I break etiquette or a rule. Please.

My theory, SM is behind the charge. In a people use SM for basic communication way. I would think many Snapchat, IG, text, FT, pic .etc. document alot of daily life for EG. More so since JH works out of town. Periods of time of their relationship is spent apart. Communicating child endangering behavior on SM would be natural. IMO
 
Leyash - Pretty sure neighbors cameras are off limits. I'm still searching for the article about it. I KNOW there was one. Any tips called in are also off limits unless reported in MSM.
 
I would also like to add, with the Google maps tracking me/my phone's movement - even if I have the location feature of my phone turned off, it will still give a general map of my movement. Sometimes the same details are there, sometimes there are less details. I like to use it to keep track of my teenager...it gives the same info some apps charge for, but as a built in feature.
 
I thought about LilTexans comment on the other thread, "we should find him a quarter of a mile away." I started thinking about how she moved from one house to next. She would stay on the residential streets and definitely knows the old area better than the new. Can anyone take a look at these "close to home" areas?

Why is that culvert on Lincoln Street bothering me so much? Ergh.
 
Reminders:

No rumors, no talk of toll booth sightings that are not confirmed, security cameras that are not confirmed, phone pings that are not confirmed, and anything else that does not have a link or has not come from one of our VIs in this case.

Please focus on the late Friday into Saturday timeline that FindLucasAllen requested at the end of the last thread.

:tyou:
 
I don't post much so forgive me if I break etiquette or a rule. Please.

My theory, SM is behind the charge. In a people use SM for basic communication way. I would think many Snapchat, IG, text, FT, pic .etc. document alot of daily life for EG. More so since JH works out of town. Periods of time of their relationship is spent apart. Communicating child endangering behavior on SM would be natural. IMO

I was wondering if maybe she "confessed" to doing something she should not have been doing to make it seem like she is telling them everything, and THAT is where the evidence of child endangerment came from. Maybe she has the mindset that if she admits to something, it would make her seem like she is telling everything. Give a little truth to make it seem like she's being completely truthful - lots of criminals have done that. I've been thinking that for a while.
 
Are there any car lots that might be easy to get into? Junkyards? That she might have easy access to, where she could go in, drop him off in a car, and leave? Without him being found for awhile?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
183
Guests online
284
Total visitors
467

Forum statistics

Threads
609,126
Messages
18,249,868
Members
234,540
Latest member
Tenuta92
Back
Top