Found Deceased KY - Savannah Spurlock, 22, left 'The Other Bar' with 2 men, Richmond, 4 Jan 2019 #3

[BaileyC]

I was just laying out possible scenarios, like it’s possible for there to be simple explanation for why they met in Lexington. One way you can tell is I will always say imo, jmo, or moo. If I state something as fact I will always try to provide a link per TOS or if asked to will try my best to find one or go back and add moo to the post until I can prove it as fact.

I'm still looking for the link to show what I said to you is correct. It's hard to find. We've discussed this in the threads but difficult to find the link.

I'm pretty new to this message board, I was here for the first time over a year ago to discuss a case and am back now to discuss the Spurlock case. Something I've learned is, I should read the threads before commenting and discussing a case. That way hopefully I would be informed on what's been said and the links provided. I don't see why when discussing a case, you need to post a link to everything said if it's been discussed before in the thread or threads. It's a nice thing to do if someone has a question but can be very time consuming to find a link when you don't recall where the topic was discussed or where you read it in the media.

 

[mtnlites]

I reject that notion based on what she was wearing. Another woman could be dressed similarly while at a bar with her husband - with no intent to "hook up."

Right. Sometimes we women just want to look and feel nice for ourselves. It's not always about attracting the attention of a man for sexual purposes.

 

[mtnlites]

The purse definitely doesn’t match.

I disagree. It looks exactly like the same purse to me.

 

[bwt42]

I'm still looking for the link to show what I said to you is correct. It's hard to find. We've discussed this in the threads but difficult to find the link.

I'm pretty new to this message board, I was here for the first time over a year ago to discuss a case and am back now to discuss the Spurlock case. Something I've learned is, I should read the threads before commenting and discussing a case. That way hopefully I would be informed on what's been said and the links provided. I don't see why when discussing a case, you need to post a link to everything said if it's been discussed before in the thread or threads. It's a nice thing to do if someone has a question but can be very time consuming to find a link when you don't recall where the topic was discussed or where you read it in the media.

You don't need links for things that have been accepted earlier in the thread. I probably upset people when I point out things that seem petty that have not been stated in msm but I feel its important to keep the thread on track.

 

[ab01]

I'm still looking for the link to show what I said to you is correct. It's hard to find. We've discussed this in the threads but difficult to find the link.

I'm pretty new to this message board, I was here for the first time over a year ago to discuss a case and am back now to discuss the Spurlock case. Something I've learned is, I should read the threads before commenting and discussing a case. That way hopefully I would be informed on what's been said and the links provided. I don't see why when discussing a case, you need to post a link to everything said if it's been discussed before in the thread or threads. It's a nice thing to do if someone has a question but can be very time consuming to find a link when you don't recall where the topic was discussed or where you read it in the media.

No problem, ya it can be overwhelming at times. The way I have been led to believe over the yrs is. That if you are claiming something as absolute fact you should always provide a link. More so if its new information. For example as far as the search areas etc I provided a map with a video to show why that map was accurate. Many other people linked a map to the home that was searched many threads ago. Which in my opinion is a borderline TOS violation bc the actual address was never released by MSM and we generally try to protect people who have not been named etc in MSM. Which is why I never included a map of the houses location and where the pond was other than to say the distance. Most times a simple you can find the link in the media and timeline thread will do if it has already been proven as fact. Or if you have the link handy its better to just supply a link. Me personally if i believe something is fact but can't support it or don't have the link handy I will say that its just an opinion so that its doesn't get confused as absolute fact and continue to snow ball from there. All JMO

 

[ab01]

Also nothing is absolute cut and dry and we all tend to have our hands smacked by mods every now and then. If you see one of your posts removed its highly likely it was out of bounds. With that said many users that have been here longer than I tend to try to help the mods by keeping things on track and not allowing opinions to be confused as fact.

eta: I can be as guilty as anybody so please don't think that i was picking on you

 

[~ Amy ~]

Actually I was zooming on that photo earlier and I’m not so sure what we were seeing wasn’t just a shadow and an object on the concrete sidewalk. I’m now not sure the purse was open after all. I don’t think I’m seeing things...

If you're looking at the same picture that I looked at then I think it looks like her phone is in her hand.
I always thought the purse was wide open but then I seen what looked like a phone ??

 

[ab01]

If you're looking at the same picture that I looked at then I think it looks like her phone is in her hand.
I always thought the purse was wide open but then I seen what looked like a phone ??

yah i agree her phone definitely appears to be in her hand in the one photo

 

[ab01]

Also I will say that most cases I tend to follow on here are a lot more faster moving than this one. Multiple threads per day and facts get twisted very rapidly and in those cases its very critical to have accurate info with links JMO

 

[jULIA_bEE]

I'm still looking for the link to show what I said to you is correct. It's hard to find. We've discussed this in the threads but difficult to find the link.

I'm pretty new to this message board, I was here for the first time over a year ago to discuss a case and am back now to discuss the Spurlock case. Something I've learned is, I should read the threads before commenting and discussing a case. That way hopefully I would be informed on what's been said and the links provided. I don't see why when discussing a case, you need to post a link to everything said if it's been discussed before in the thread or threads. It's a nice thing to do if someone has a question but can be very time consuming to find a link when you don't recall where the topic was discussed or where you read it in the media.

What article are you trying to find?

 

[ab01]

I'm still looking for the link to show what I said to you is correct. It's hard to find. We've discussed this in the threads but difficult to find the link.

I'm pretty new to this message board, I was here for the first time over a year ago to discuss a case and am back now to discuss the Spurlock case. Something I've learned is, I should read the threads before commenting and discussing a case. That way hopefully I would be informed on what's been said and the links provided. I don't see why when discussing a case, you need to post a link to everything said if it's been discussed before in the thread or threads. It's a nice thing to do if someone has a question but can be very time consuming to find a link when you don't recall where the topic was discussed or where you read it in the media.

I think I misunderstood what the topic of your original statement was, Were you referring to your statement that the female friend of SS that was with her that night rode with her from Richmond? If so you got me bc I looked and looked and I was also unable to back it up through MSM.

 

[jULIA_bEE]

I think I misunderstood what the topic of your original statement was, Were you referring to your statement that the female friend of SS that was with her that night rode with her from Richmond? If so you got me bc I looked and looked and I was also unable to back it up through MSM.

Here's a link talking about how the two went to Lexington around 10 pm that night. I can probably find the other article where it mentions the friends going to a male friends apartment in Lexington and then going to the bar.
‘I’m begging you.’ Missing Kentucky woman’s mom thinks men have more to tell.

 

[ab01]

Here's a link talking about how the two went to Lexington around 10 pm that night. I can probably find the other article where it mentions the friends going to a male friends apartment in Lexington and then going to the bar.
‘I’m begging you.’ Missing Kentucky woman’s mom thinks men have more to tell.

Awesome thx that’s a great article too. I hadn’t read it. It kind of gives you a little more insight into leading up to going out.

 

[jULIA_bEE]

I think I misunderstood what the topic of your original statement was, Were you referring to your statement that the female friend of SS that was with her that night rode with her from Richmond? If so you got me bc I looked and looked and I was also unable to back it up through MSM.

Here's the other link and I've copied and pasted the part about stopping at the friends apartment in Lexington
"On the night of Thursday, Jan. 3, Savannah left their house in Ellen’s car with a female friend. The females stopped at a male friend’s house in Lexington and together the three got into a different car bound for a bar in Lexington."

Missing Kentucky mom's ex-boyfriend, mother shed light on disappearance

 

[thesaint]

Right. Sometimes we women just want to look and feel nice for ourselves. It's not always about attracting the attention of a man for sexual purposes.

Dressing for themselves + I think women dress for other women more than they do men. Especially when going out with their girlfriends for the night, phone calls/texts get exchanged discussing what to wear. Women don't need to go to all that much trouble to attract the attention of men.

 

[Southern_Girl]

Deleted. Already posted.

 

[ab01]

Here's the other link and I've copied and pasted the part about stopping at the friends apartment in Lexington
"On the night of Thursday, Jan. 3, Savannah left their house in Ellen’s car with a female friend. The females stopped at a male friend’s house in Lexington and together the three got into a different car bound for a bar in Lexington."

Missing Kentucky mom's ex-boyfriend, mother shed light on disappearance

This is interesting. So it’s highly possible that the female friend and SS car may have been at the male friends overnight. Which still make me wonder if ss May have thought she was just going to another bar and not to a home in Garrard County. I think it even more leads to it being a possible ruse and savannah not having any intentions on going to that house. Jmo but things seem more clearer to me. When I first started following I was led to believe by previous discussions on here that SS car was left at the bar. Moo thx so much and Baileyc and I can quit looking!

 

[Deleted member 158085]

This is interesting. So it’s highly possible that the female friend and SS car may have been at the male friends overnight. Which still make me wonder if ss May have thought she was just going to another bar and not to a home in Garrard County. I think it even more leads to it being a possible ruse and savannah not having any intentions on going to that house. Jmo but things seem more clearer to me. When I first started following I was led to believe by previous discussions on here that SS car was left at the bar. Moo thx so much and Baileyc and I can quit looking!

Yeah, IMO she had no intention of going to Garrard County. I can think of a half dozen other things she could have thought they were doing instead.

 

[jULIA_bEE]

This is interesting. So it’s highly possible that the female friend and SS car may have been at the male friends overnight. Which still make me wonder if ss May have thought she was just going to another bar and not to a home in Garrard County. I think it even more leads to it being a possible ruse and savannah not having any intentions on going to that house. Jmo but things seem more clearer to me. When I first started following I was led to believe by previous discussions on here that SS car was left at the bar. Moo thx so much and Baileyc and I can quit looking!

They found SS's car at an apartment complex. They never named the complex in MSM so I don't want to put that out there. I had assumed it was at the apt complex that the male friend lived at but that's never been verified either. I do think at some point she would have needed to get a ride to her car, either something like uber or from someone else. Maybe she thought they were going to drive her back? Or maybe she was going to hang out for a little bit longer and then get a ride back to her car with them. She left her phone charger in the car which makes me think she hadn't planned on being gone for real long. Even her friend and mom are quoted saying that she would never let her phone just die. And you're welcome!

 

[ab01]

Many people were speculating why would she leave her car behind. Well of course she left her car behind! She didn't have it, it was parked at the male friends. And she was likely planning to be dropped off at the male friends apartment after hitting another bar or what have you. Wow it really smacks you in the face even just adding in the few details that we are privy to ....This was no accident IMO