oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,707
I think she was and I think cell data was what led them there in the first place to search originally.
They simply missed her the first time imo
It’s not uncommon at all
I'm not convinced she was there the entire time. Imo she was not, and that is why they are guesstimating she had been there for four months.
If the evidence showed them she had been there the entire time they wouldnt have said four months instead of 6 months or more.. which is a big difference in time.
Imo, he thought the coast was clear when the search ended, and after then is when he put her there. Imo
Jmho