Kiranerys
Justice for Gannon
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 2,859
- Reaction score
- 31,638
Was Charlie introspective and withdrawn like the letter writer? Had Charlie experienced unique advantages, privileges, and experiences? It sounds like he was very intelligent as evidenced by his grades and exam score but would Charlie write something so staid and formal? Would he be the type to read the works of Durkheim? Were the clothes found on the UID typical of something Charlie would wear (down to mismatched socks)?
Charlie's mom's account of his drug use and new friends make it seem like he might have been more impulsive and social than the letter writer. The suicide was obviously methodically planned and executed (unlike Charlie's jumping out of a window). I just don't get the feeling that the letter writer's reference to lingering for "years under care" is a reference to residential substance abuse treatment.
It's almost as if the ruling out of the body as Charlie's by his mom doesn't take into account other attributes of the UID that we can surmise from the note and from the careful planning of the suicide. We hear details about Charlie's physical characteristics but not much about his mannerisms and personality.
Part of the article quotes a part of the note and says that to the wallaces it was as if Charlie was talking straight to them. Just my take on it but I understood that to mean the way the note was written was characteristic of Charlie.
I think you could be right, she recognised him but didn't want to admit it.