BayouBecky
New Member
- Joined
- May 27, 2012
- Messages
- 160
- Reaction score
- 0
What I continued to be intrigued by is what the allowed amount of actual lying is allowed.
For example, they claim there is no additional footage of Mickey. And then A.C.I. says there is continuous footage somewhere down on St. Landry. So would they lie or can we then conclude that she did divert her path right there or was hit right there somewhere.
It's clear they withold info. But how much outright lying would they do. If they can just lie for undisclosed reasons, I feel like a lot of us are wasting our time trying to even do any brainwork based on the tiny bits of info released.
THIS! This is what I was trying to say when A.C.I. mentioned the continuous footage. I know that info gets withheld, but just to what extent does misdirection go when working with LE?
Not angry, just curious about what lengths they can go to, that's all.