A.C.I
Private Investigator
I was agreeing with you. That you didn't say too much....
Oh I know. That was intended for whomever said I revealed too much personal info
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was agreeing with you. That you didn't say too much....
A.C.I. didn't, someone else said "It must be ___ or ____ (two very common first names), A.C.I. says that poster was joking.
Right now, I am sort of feeling bad for this new POI who lost his daughter. I cannot imagine the pain he felt, the pain he feels, or how horrible a new, similar-ish case happening near you would be. I will give him a pass on driving around alone at night.
Of course, I am not sure of all of ACI's clues so I cannot speak to his guilt or not being guilty.
My opinions only, no facts here:
I have previously posted a few enhanced photos on this thread. Tonight, I am reviewing a lot of previous posts and realize that even though my images contain glaring disclaimers about my modifications, and even though the texts of my accompanying messages contain strong disclaimers, there still is some confusion about what is real (the original surveillance pics) and what is opinion or even fantasy (my enhancements).
I have been enhancing digital pics for ten years, for valid reasons involving scientific report-writing. Not uncommonly, with a scientific report, the original image has problems with lighting, color representation, sharpness, contrast, etc. Correcting such problems IS a valid procedure, if the enhancer is not particularly biased. By the way, my good friends, I do not use Photoshop AND the ONLY time I use a paintbrush or color tone alteration is when the original colors are corrupted by low-lighting or problematic lighting contrasts in overlapping high and low sunlight OR darkness with artificial light sources. On Websleuths, for the most part, I sharpen individual pixels, or fiddle with the contrast of individual pixels.
Would it work better if I put my disclaimers of "altered" or "fantasy image" as a diagonal text rather than a horizontal text? I am not pulling your chain here; I am looking for suggestions as how to not confuse any reader of this thread in the future.
With feedback, I might get motivated enough to post my very recent efforts at enhancement of the Circle-K pics.
-------------The fact that horses CAN and DO cause injuries to themselves is one thing and I wasn't aware of that. People fall down and break their arm or leg all the time too.
That said, I still want to know the reason that Mickey's horse had a sliced nostril. Even if odds are 90% clumsy horse / 10% caused by human hand, I'd like to know the answer to this particular injury. Although interesting, I didn't ask what usually causes injured noses to horses.
Does anybody else understand my point even if the odds are slim it amounts to anything? Sometimes details do provide important clues.
It's not wrong to ask about them imo.
I'm intrigued by this part of your comment, can you clarify? Is your POI using high zoom tp lenses OR are you saying that what you observed via high zoom tp lenses made you suspicious?Originally Posted by A.C.I
... and then the high zoom telephoto lenses are what really make me suspicious.
BBM
Not true at all on any level in any way.
Personal experience.
http://www.findmickeynow.com/mickey2.jpeg
In this pic... is it just me or does it look like our VOI fueling up?
Thanks for your input. But remember it was 10 years ago. Not exactly recent. And also mental illness runs in the family.
Also, not the type of person you would see out at the time of night. Thats why I first noticed him. And then the description Patterson gave came out and it matched up.
I understand the wanting to help, and the searching. But driving circles in the middle of nowhere an hour out of town in the middle of the night isn't exactly searching. But then lying about that, being at the scene of where evidence was found the day before it was found, his mental state I observed while talking to him, and then the high zoom telephoto lenses are what really make me suspicious.
-------------
I also took care of a horse when I was young, and never was there a sliced nostril.
I'd also like to know what the definitive cause was for this injury.
It's a sure bet that she loved that horse like her life.
So, as it's known that abusers sometimes will harm pets to threaten victims--you do have to wonder if it's a deliberate gesture to keep her under control--possibly letting her read about it having happened?
I dont think so. But I suppose its possible
--------------This may be totally reaching, but could it be that this POI that A.C.I. mentioned could be an "amateur-type" private investigator? Not one that's licensed or anything, but just really into this sort of thing since the death of his child? I'm a bad sleuther too, I always want to think people aren't inherently evil.
No past criminal record. Mental illness in the family. Lost a child similar to Mickeys age. Went missing and wasnt found for months (Guilty party was caught)
I think those pics are not going to show us what we need. Other than a WT that could be involved....we can't see the person driving or the plate. Iwas here many years ago when a young woman from orlando went missing....we had the image of the person that dropped her car off in an apt complex..but to this day no one has found the person driving the car and walking after the fact....and she is still missing. And that image was blown up discussed every way you could do it.
-----------Well it's good to know all horses aren't clumsy - lol!
Apparently Mickey knew her horse had a sliced nostril already before she disappeared. No info was given as to why or how or when the horse got the injury. Ashely, her friend, used the horse's injury for an example as to why MS would not have disappeared prior to the weekend. Mickey already knew her horse had an injury because she told Ashley that he did. Did Mickey tell Ashely how the horse got hurt? We don't know because what they printed in the article was that Ashley said, the horse had a 'sliced nostril' and that Mickey would want to check on him over the weekend.
Using the word sliced versus injured or cut is what caught my attention.
When I run into a fence do I slice myself? I ran into a fence and I cut myself or I tore open my hand.
Could be a misunderstanding but her words caught my attention.
o/t ~ Did you mention eating lutefisk not long ago? That cracked me up as not too many people would think of eating lutefisk! That includes me and I'm of Norwegian descent - ha!