Wonder if Andrew will feign ignorance this time too..... had no idea why DM was asking this of him. Not a clue...... ya right.OK so the friend DM asked to "keep tabs on" Laura was Andrew Michalski. I guess AM will be a witness in this trial too,
Wonder if Andrew will feign ignorance this time too..... had no idea why DM was asking this of him. Not a clue...... ya right.OK so the friend DM asked to "keep tabs on" Laura was Andrew Michalski. I guess AM will be a witness in this trial too,
So much for the unwilling Smich, a victim of circumstances and a patsy. I'd like to offer a lifetime supply of iPads to Smich. Reminds me of that parrot they recently used to convict a woman of shooting her husband.
And they have the nerve to plead "not guilty" ? With all the blunders and evidence???? Mind boggling actually...
IMHO, this tells a tremendous amount about DM and his panache for premeditated murder. IIRC he researched the truck for a long time; maybe the test drives before TB were actually part of his planning process? I wouldn't be surprised to see that he started planning WM's murder shortly after LB's. If he had started planning for LB in April- murdered her 4 months later in July but not disposing of the body until the end of July...4 months later he murders WM and then has to deal with closing down the business, finishing up at the end of December- 4 months later, he had another one planned TB and then he was going to be headed to the Baja. IMHO, the only thing that stopped his need to kill was TB and the HWPD. Also, the fact that he texted CN that he was going to hurt LB makes me shutter. What did "hurt her" and "make her disappear" mean to CN?
She was burned on July 23rd? So she was dead since July 3rd and was kept somewhere for 20 days? sigh.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/woman-killed-for-role-in-love-triangle-court-hears-1.3644026
Made himself sick thinking about what they did to Laura?
Just that the blood evidence ( ? ) was at one end of the board, perhaps where her head was, and covered by a bag, which would be approx. the length to cover a head and neck stain. IMO
Does look like DM's fixated on her escort/stripping activity and mental instability, as if that's going to instil "reasonable doubt" into the mind of the jury. DM is feeling powerful questioning LB's dad and SL- lets see how he does when the forensic people get on the stand. I have a feeling that the first "alpha male" that gets up there may rattle DM more than a bit.
Co-accused Dellen Millard, right, questions witness Clayton Babcock father of Laura Babcock while Justice Michael Code and co-accused Mark Smich listen. Millard and Smich are charged with first-degree murder in Laura Babcocks death.
http://nationalpost.com/news/canada...ning-father-of-woman-he-is-accused-of-killing
I think it's very likely that Laura's body was in the blue tarp, or rug as another person has described it. Especially since our poster who was at the trial today seems to think the picture was possibly taken at the farm.
MOO
In the vein of “things you wish Mr. Babcock would have said”:
“Do you find this difficult because I am the accused?”
“No, Mr. Milllard. If you murdered my daughter I couldn’t be more thrilled that you’re representing yourself...”
Probably a blue rug ftom DM's home and maybe there will be DNA evidence from DM's house proving that Laura was murdered in his home. They got that idea somewhere for the opening arguments ��
Sorry if this was mentioned already. I've only gotten to this post.
OK so the friend DM asked to "keep tabs on" Laura was Andrew Michalski. I guess AM will be a witness in this trial too,
If the blue tarp/rug did hold Laura’s body, you have to wonder why anybody would photograph that. Trophy? Keeping somebody apprised? I just can’t wrap my head around how stupid they were leaving this 8 lane highway of evidence between the two cases.