Just4TB
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2016
- Messages
- 601
- Reaction score
- 291
A throwback... with relevance to the LB trial, below are a few (random) quotes as reported and tweeted during the TB trial, Goodman's instructions to the jury...
Key points - Aider & abbetter. (MS provided Isho contact arrangement, MS participated in measurements for incinerator intended use)
- Principle offender. (One of them killed her, which one is not important if they both participated in the planning)
I am looking fwd to hearing Code's charge to the jury. Decision trees would be useful. Hopefully we have good media tweeting.
Source - Justice Goodman, snippets from various Tweets from various reporters,
Participation as a principle offender...
"A non shooter may be a party to the offence as an aider or abettor," Goodman says. There are different decision trees for each.
So we're clear, the "principle" here would be the shooter.
Goodman is starting with manslaughter, and talking about how that charge applies if a person didn't intend to kill Bosma.
One person may the shooter, the other not. The non-shooter can be an aider and abetter.
Are you satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused under consideration caused the death of Timothy Bosma?
Manslaughter — Did the accused cause death of deceased? By an unlawful act that was objectively dangerous?
If yes, go on to next question. If no, was this person an aider or abetter?
Key points - Aider & abbetter. (MS provided Isho contact arrangement, MS participated in measurements for incinerator intended use)
- Principle offender. (One of them killed her, which one is not important if they both participated in the planning)
I am looking fwd to hearing Code's charge to the jury. Decision trees would be useful. Hopefully we have good media tweeting.
Source - Justice Goodman, snippets from various Tweets from various reporters,
Participation as a principle offender...
"A non shooter may be a party to the offence as an aider or abettor," Goodman says. There are different decision trees for each.
So we're clear, the "principle" here would be the shooter.
Goodman is starting with manslaughter, and talking about how that charge applies if a person didn't intend to kill Bosma.
One person may the shooter, the other not. The non-shooter can be an aider and abetter.
Are you satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused under consideration caused the death of Timothy Bosma?
Manslaughter — Did the accused cause death of deceased? By an unlawful act that was objectively dangerous?
If yes, go on to next question. If no, was this person an aider or abetter?