Ahhh it's always an accidental drowning. Like Dr. G said "100% of accidental drownings are reported to 911". People don't make accidents look like kidnappings.
No. They make make murders look like accidents that looked like kidnappings.
Ahhh it's always an accidental drowning. Like Dr. G said "100% of accidental drownings are reported to 911". People don't make accidents look like kidnappings.
Well, that's just too bad for a mother who gets drunk and is unable to provide proper care for her baby. Worry about being blamed?!?!?! IMHO, a mother should be blamed for the "accident" because she could have prevented it if she hadn't been drunk.
Should she not be more concerned/worried/upset/etc. about her dead drowned baby????
BTW, his name is Marc Klaas. He would not have needed to submit to a poly graph - no one ever suspected he was guilty of anything. His daughter was abducted from a slumber party and there were two 12 year old girls who had iron clad stories of what happened - and Marc was not involved. The girls eventually untangled themselves from their bondage, and notified Polly's mother what happened.
Marc was never a suspect.
I heart Mark Klass. What a classy gentleman!
:beats:
There wasn't an "accidental" drowning!!! Not in this case and not in the Caylee Anthony case. 100% of accidental drownings are reported. I know this from personal experience. My nephew got out of the house at 18 months old. It was wintertime, he fell in the pool. He had figured out how to unlocked the sliding glass door and open it, back them the locks were low and the doors weren't heavy. When he was found, BLUE, COLD, STIFF and we thought very dead, 911 was called! With a family member shouting 911 orders to my other family member, my nephew was revived, brought back from not breathing, brought back from stone cold dead. Never ONCE, for a SECOND, was there ANY hesitation on ANYONE'S part to do the right thing and TRY to save the baby. There was NO time for any thought to come into anyone's head, pure reaction, just something you DO when anyone is in crisis. It wouldn't have mattered if he was there for 10 minutes or 30 minutes, the reaction would NOT HAVE CHANGED!!
Sorry for shouting, but coming from one that has personally experienced this same trauma, you don't hide the baby, make up stories, not call 911 or bury the child in the woods!!!!! EVER!
I have never posted about this, not even in the FCA forum when that was her defense excuse, just had to post it tonight. There can't be another baby in which this excuse it used! I can't take it. Baby Lisa did not accidentally drown. Period. IMO. JMO. MOO!
gwenabob - Thank you. We didn't know how long my nephew was in the pool, he was blue, cold and no heart beat. DB wouldn't have known how long Baby Lisa was in the bathtub, according to your theory, any mother's natural reaction would be to call 911, period. Now, is she intentionally drowned her child (we have seen that one), only then would she not all for help. JMO! My opinion will never change on this one. No amount of a cushy, comfy, lifestyle would change any "mom's" natural reaction. The phones missing, just adds to my theory, whoever did this to Baby Lisa, knew something was on those phones.
Police have issued public appeals to Bradley and Irwin for separate unrestricted interviews to follow up on issues raised at their last formal interrogation on Oct. 8.
Conducting separate interviews is a standard police procedure. Officers even do it at traffic accident scenes, where they pull drivers and witnesses apart to speak to them. So they certainly wouldnt deviate from the practice in a missing-child case, said Capt. Steve Young, a Kansas City police spokesman.
We want to know what they have to say on their own, Young said.
The parents also have refused to allow police to have specially trained social workers reinterview their older children from previous relationships, boys ages 6 and 8 who were at the home when Lisa disappeared.
As a general rule, police do not interview children who are witnesses. Instead, they refer them to a child protection center, where social workers talk to the children. Police are not allowed in the room.
In the Irwin case, social workers talked to one boy for 30 minutes and the other boy for 50 minutes the day Lisa vanished. Police have not been able to send the boys back to the center.
I would be utterly appalled if LE violated DB and JI's rights.I agree they should be interviewed separately. Nothing wrong with that at all. Lets see if they have consistent stories. I hope LE gets to do this. I dont understand how they cannot make them do this. We have a missing baby here... Seems the parents have forgotten that..
There wasn't an "accidental" drowning!!! Not in this case and not in the Caylee Anthony case. 100% of accidental drownings are reported. I know this from personal experience. My nephew got out of the house at 18 months old. It was wintertime, he fell in the pool. He had figured out how to unlocked the sliding glass door and open it, back them the locks were low and the doors weren't heavy. When he was found, BLUE, COLD, STIFF and we thought very dead, 911 was called! With a family member shouting 911 orders to my other family member, my nephew was revived, brought back from not breathing, brought back from stone cold dead. Never ONCE, for a SECOND, was there ANY hesitation on ANYONE'S part to do the right thing and TRY to save the baby. There was NO time for any thought to come into anyone's head, pure reaction, just something you DO when anyone is in crisis. It wouldn't have mattered if he was there for 10 minutes or 30 minutes, the reaction would NOT HAVE CHANGED!!
Sorry for shouting, but coming from one that has personally experienced this same trauma, you don't hide the baby, make up stories, not call 911 or bury the child in the woods!!!!! EVER!
I have never posted about this, not even in the FCA forum when that was her defense excuse, just had to post it tonight. There can't be another baby in which this excuse it used! I can't take it. Baby Lisa did not accidentally drown. Period. IMO. JMO. MOO!
With all due respect, you have not experienced the "very same trauma." We do not know Lisa's fate. I seriously doubt she left the house on her own or that she experienced an accidentally death.
I may be misinterpreting but I believe that was the poster's entire point. :waitasec:
This is a perfect example of the addition of facts.
First no mention of the alcohol
Then I was drunk
Then I was drunk and I take anti-anxiety drugs every morning.
Now, her rep adds one more thing to the long litany of excuses for her not hearing/remembering the events of that night.
I was drunk, I take an anti-anxiety drug every morning and, oh yeah I forgot, I took a sleeping pill.
I guess having the fan on high was keeping her drunk self awake.
I still feel something happened to Lisa earlier than the parents "kidnapping" timeline, so that gave them plenty of time to "take care of Lisa" and come up with a reason why she was missing.
Unfortunately as we all know, the longer Lisa is missing, she will probably never be found and no one will be charged.
I'm having a lot of trouble wrapping my brain around the fact that the parents of a reportedly "kidnapped" baby are forcing LE to negotiate an interview with them. Really?
I can understand why. If what mom said happened during the first interview session is true, I'd want to negotiate an interview as well.
If I was truly innocent, showing me burnt clothing and accusing me of harming my child would indicate and convince me that they are narrow minded and are not looking for my abducted child.
I'd negotiate a deal to ask any questions that would not point the finger at me and I would want proof that they are following up on all potential leads in the case.
But that would be an oxymoron. If I had a missing child and I banned any questions about me the police would be unable to follow up on all potential leads by definition.
I know I'm innocent but the police don't. They need to eliminate me to move forward with the investigation.
If they find somebody else it will hurt their case if the suspect's defense attorney will be able to point out all the questions that I refused to answer, I who was there, I who was the last one to see my baby. It could give them reasonable doubt and I don't want that, I want justice for my child.