Hell is too good for Rafferty.No quetion the terms "underage rape", "real underage rape", "real underage rape picture" could in anyway be miscontrued for exactly what they are.
The same vile filth as what happened to Victoria.
Make me want to get sick.
Piece. Of. Trash.
I can only in my worst nightmare imagine what this did to Tori.
Rot in HELL, Rafferty.
I am beyond disgusted with what has come out so far, feeling sick to my stomach. Not sure if this has been posted so far, it's not really clear why this woman did not testify:
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/05/10/what-the-jury-didnt-hear_n_1507746.html
The jury also did not know that in January 2009 a woman Rafferty met on dating website Plenty of Fish, where he met most of the other women he dated, invited Rafferty over to her house to watch a movie. According to a police complaint, he arrived with an already opened bottle of wine, poured her some, but did not drink any himself.
She told police she started to feel "fuzzy," the room started to spin and Rafferty climbed on top of her on the couch. He started choking her, removing her clothes and tying her hands behind her back, according to the police report, which was cited in court documents. She started vomiting, and Rafferty anally raped her while still choking her, she alleged.
There were no charges laid in the matter.
Cornered in a tiny room at the Woodstock, Ont., police station on May 19, 2009, a sniveling Rafferty nearly vomited into a bucket at the mention of Bernardo who was convicted in 1995 of sexually assaulting and murdering two teenage girls, while he videotaped their torture.
Theres no doubt in my mind that youre involved in the abduction of Tori. No doubt at all. Were past that, says Det. Staff-Sgt. Chris Loam from the Ontario Provincial Polices Behavioural Sciences unit.
Where can we follow the tweets minute by minute while jurors are deliberating and when a verdict comes forth? Please and thank you! <3
I can't blame his mother, she may have had absolutely no idea.
Mike, this is the girl you killed. Shes not missing anymore. Shes dead
You told her to get a girl and you wanted her young, says Smyth.
Smyth, a seasoned interrogator who a year later drew a confession out of ex-Col. Russell Williams on the horrific murders of two women and sexual assault of two others in eastern Ontario, flies into a rage.
Do you want to tell us your side of the story? Get rid of your fing security blanket and start being a man, because it is not going to be her semen we find on her body, he says.
Tori Stafford is all over your car. All over it. And Terri-Lynne explains everything were going to find and youre explaining nothing. So I dont give a f if you say one more word, tell you the truth.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/0...-am-i-sitting-across-from-paul-bernardo-here/
Whoops, I started a new thread about what the jury didn't hear. Sorry, can you wipe my thread mods? xoxo
So according to the interrogation MR did have a criminal record...hmm. Wow he sounds so pathetic in these interviews. "Poor sick guy". PUKE! MOO
I believe they were going only by the evidence that was admitted and "innocent until proven guilty" and were swayed by Derstine's rhetoric. I also think there are people on this board who have aspirations to the legal profession and take the role of devil's advocate just for the sport and to see how far they can take it.
Knowing what we know now, it makes me wish that in its closing arguments, the Crown could have told the jury what they heard was only the tip of the iceberg and a large part of the evidence had to be suppressed because of a bungled search warrant and other technicalities.
What really frightens me is that the jury could find him not guilty, or just guilty of a lesser charge. They would never forgive themselves after learning the truth. I have always dreamed of serving on a jury, but when crap like this happens where a jury has to rule on inadequate evidence when the truth is withheld, I would want no part of it.
The jurors did hear that JG had a drug debt (as testified to by TM).
From the snippet you posted, it is my impression that the convo about taking a child was an interrogation between JG's dealer and LE, not a convo between JG and the dealer.
Make sense?
JMO
Wonder what the people who didn't feel MR is guilty on all counts are thinking now...