Please do not take offense, but can you tell me why you think TH is guilty and of what? Dollars to donuts your reasons will not be evidentiary but moral ones. There is not one scintilla of true evidence that has been released in this case, that indicates TH is guilty for whatever has befallen little Kyron.
There has been a plethora of innuendo tossed around; cell phone pings, bank records, mfh plots, sexting, even the possibility of a lesbian relationship have been debated ad nauseum along with white truck sightings (or not). Her personal past has been analyzed and it's been established that she is a money-hungry, sex crazy, domineering, sociopath who cannot put her masters degree to use in her profession.
But what true evidence exists that she is guilty.
What makes people suspect her?
Unfortunately for her, she "vented" about failing a polygraph to her family and they saw fit to share that with the news media.
I have zero actual evidence to show TH is guilty of anything. LE has released nothing. I don't care about money hungry, sex crazy allegations or possible personality disorders, her lack of use of her master's, etc. None of that impresses me as evidence of a reason to sway me towards guilt.
I have seen reports that have not been substantiated that would
together support guilt in my mind which have nothing to do with her moral character or career path, marriages, divorces, affairs, whatever. But I won't go into those because those were not the one thing that convinced me of her guilt.
That one thing is giving up her baby by refusing to fight the RO, or the allegations therein and by trying to abate the disso. As a lawyer who has practiced primarily family law since 2002, with lots of that including DV cases, this points to TH's guilt to me.
I have posted extensively on why that is but she has seriously prejudiced her ability to regain any significant custody of her daughter. The only way I would recommend such a tactic to a client who loved his or her children and desperately wanted significant contact with their kids is if I knew my client was guilty of something criminal that could result in serious prison time. This is based on my experience as a family law attorney and the knowledge that has afforded me as to how custody and visitation works.
Essentially, IMO, no mother would give up custody and visitation rights (which TH absolutely has for now), over unproven allegations that amount to nothing more than hearsay. Kaine would have had to trot in LE investigators and present evidence to substantiate those allegations in order for him to prevail in his RO application but TH just lay down and accepted the RO and the loss of any form of contact with her baby, for whom she was the primary caregiver, allowing those allegations to remain unchallenged. That tells me she has something to hide in connection to those allegations.
People have proposed various reasons for why this may not be significant. None, from a legal or logic standpoint, make sense to me. (Like, she's just waiting for her chance to fight until some undisclosed time in the future, or that Baby K is safer with Kaine due to threats and there apparently is no way for her to have ANY contact with the child that would be safe - IMO nonsense - or that she lacks the resources to fight for custody or to have custody so she just gave it all up and thus prejudiced her ability to regain custody in the future, etc.).
What do I think she is guilty of? Either custodial interference or kidnapping and murder. I won't know until more evidence is released and/or more evidence is discovered by LE.
Let me add that when I first began reading on the Kyron thread, I left for a while because I felt that some of the things being said about TH were unfair and a huge stretch and had nothing to do with whether she is involved. I had no opinion either way regarding her involvement. The RO stuff then came out and caught my attention. TH's reaction to those allegations threw me off the fence, hard!