List Attorney/Client visits we wish to request/Jail Logs uploaded in post 33

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
In the article in the link it states that Baez is under investigation by the bar for spreading lies about the prosecutors. What in the world? Do we know anything about this? every time I think I have heard it all......

"Baez is not teaching freshmen, he's teaching upper-level classes how to get ready for trial.

Jose Baez passed the bar exam just three years ago. He has already confused jurisdiction and botched a motion in the Casey Anthony case. Now, he's teaching law students at FAMU.

"How's it going so far?" WFTV reporter Sean Lavin asked FAMU College of Law Dean Leroy Pernell.

"I don't know yet. We've only been in session since here for a couple weeks at best," he said.

Baez is also under Florida Bar investigation over allegations he spread false statements about the prosecutors.

"If he's being investigated by the Bar, there's a reason why, and they're supposed to be setting examples for us," FAMU law student Chris Hancock said."
Could it be Judge Strickland's complaint? We never did find out info about that. Remember when Baez wanted to get the prosecutors kicked off the case? Could be related to that. Gosh, there have been so many "golden" Baez moments. lol
 
It is true that a client has some privileges.
It is also true that the Law has a job to do and bring justice for Caylee.

I think for us to see the tapes is voyeuristic, and sensationalistic.
And it can create more appeals and a waist of more time.
I do think that the powers that be THE STATE needs to see all the tapes and study them...
Cant trust her family, cant trust her, and cant trust her legal defense team.
THE STATE SHOULD GET every single move she makes.
JMHO
 
Could it be Judge Strickland's complaint? We never did find out info about that. Remember when Baez wanted to get the prosecutors kicked off the case? Could be related to that. Gosh, there have been so many "golden" Baez moments. lol

"Golden Baez moments"! I love that!
 
Can you please supply the LINK for this? I know you've got the attachment, but I don't know how to get the LINK?

I wanted to share this with some over in the Insession Boards. They've been wanting to see this for months! :woohoo:


here you go. Casey's visitor log from the jail. Special thanks to Greenturtlegirl for getting this log for us.

You will have to rotate it once counter clockwise to read it properly and you do need adobe reader to do so.

Tricia
 
In Diane Fannings book she states that one of the bar complaints about Baez had to do with Todd Black while working under Baez's direction made derogatory statements about the State's Attorney and Assistant State's Attorneys. Baez was never proved to have given Todd Black (Mr. Cabott) permission/direction to do this on his behalf and the case was closed. She said the complaint from the judge was similar to Dominick Casey's related to Baez instructing him not to call the authorities if and when he found the child's body.

Does anyone have a copy of the rules/laws about who indeed is allowed to visit under the wing of attorney / client visits rather than have to visit through the phone/video system he friends and family must visit through? I am interested in how and why the private investigator is allowed to visit with her in person.

You all have done some amazing work looking in to who these various visitors are. If it turns out that indeed they are making media deals with Casey or trademarking her baby's likeness or name I will not be surprised. With all the media attention the Tot Mom play has received, it would be highly unlikely the idea has not ran through Casey and Baez's mind, and as she sits there today she is still presumed innocent, even in the check fraud case.So, it would be now or never to make any such deals. Once she pleads or is found guilty all of those deals will be made by her parents which I trust just burns her up to imagine. Before he decided he was not to return here to w/s, I tried to ask Mr. Hornsby the legal question , if someone acting on Baez's instruction or indeed working for him made the media deals would he be held accountable to the judge for insisting "I" have made no such deals, whatsoever? If he is splitting hairs Bill Clinton style and saying HE didn't make the deal isn't that unethical, if it is being done at his instruction?

It reminds me of the boss having an amount of plausible dependability and the lesser employee being the sacrificial lamb if the deal goes sour. Oliver North comes to mind.I lost what remained of my naïveté watching those Iran Contra hearings.

I trust the State is watching these visitor logs carefully , since the best predictor of Baez's ethics is his past behavior, they would be derelict not to watch with scrutiny. Just as quickly as we can google the visitor names and background so can the State. I think they have a full knowing of who visits and why. I imagine it is Mom and Pop who are a nervous wreck trying to figure it out with only someone as inexperienced as Dominick to help them do so, they may as well consult their eight ball.8.jpg
 
Hi guys sorry this was gone so long.

Please be careful about posting names and linking to people unless you are sure they are the same person on the visitor log. It just gets a little dicey when we link to different people with the same name and have no idea if any of them are even involved.
If any of you want to investigate this, we can perhaps move this to the members only area and work on it in there with a bit more freedom. I won't be around, but if anyone wants to do that, let Kimster know and she can move this over there and perhaps restore some of the information that was removed.
 
Hi guys sorry this was gone so long.

Please be careful about posting names and linking to people unless you are sure they are the same person on the visitor log. It just gets a little dicey when we link to different people with the same name and have no idea if any of them are even involved.
If any of you want to investigate this, we can perhaps move this to the members only area and work on it in there with a bit more freedom. I won't be around, but if anyone wants to do that, let Kimster know and she can move this over there and perhaps restore some of the information that was removed.

Thanks JBean....
I don't think we need to move it as there is a lot of good info here, but perhaps we could have a members only analysis thread with that info. Will PM Kimster.
 
Thanks JBean....
I don't think we need to move it as there is a lot of good info here, but perhaps we could have a members only analysis thread with that info. Will PM Kimster.

JBean agreed and I'm working on it now. Keep your eyes open in the private forum for the new thread later tonight.

And thanks JBean! :blowkiss:
 
In all honesty, I don't think the "in Jail" Surveillance video is technically a public record; which is why we have not seen any released. I think Judge Strickland may have overlooked this when he wrote his order.

See Section 119.071(2)(d), Florida Statutes. "General exemptions from inspection or copying of public records.--"

I agree and also want to add that I thought one of the reasons why it seemed silly to file a motion to destroy the videos is because there was little likelihood the public would ever view them...
 
NEW Casey jail visitor log

September 18, 2009 to January 24, 2010

http://s439.photobucket.com/albums/...rrent=KCjailvisitorsSept182009toJan242010.jpg

KCjailvisitorsSept182009toJan242010.jpg
 
I was able to obtain a tape of one of the KC / Counsel visits. While there was no sound......I made note of my observations......

KC: flipped hair 47 times, passed notes 3x, stomped feet and threw temper tantrum 5 x, placed hands over ears and shut her eyes and shook head side to side in "no" fashion 3x.

JB: looked at the ceiling 24 x, shrugged shoulders 574 x, stood up and threatened to leave 6 x, slammed laptop shut 5x.

So..................I think we can interpret how that visit went.

BTW..................I am just kidding. In the absence of any tapes to discuss......I thought I would provide an entertainment intermission.
 
I was able to obtain a tape of one of the KC / Counsel visits. While there was no sound......I made note of my observations......

KC: flipped hair 47 times, passed notes 3x, stomped feet and threw temper tantrum 5 x, placed hands over ears and shut her eyes and shook head side to side in "no" fashion 3x.

JB: looked at the ceiling 24 x, shrugged shoulders 574 x, stood up and threatened to leave 6 x, slammed laptop shut 5x.

So..................I think we can interpret how that visit went.

BTW..................I am just kidding. In the absence of any tapes to discuss......I thought I would provide an entertainment intermission.

Well done Sleutherontheside! I see the motion to stop taping prisoner/lawyer meetings was denied late Monday. Gotta love JS.
 
I'm wondering how much actual time the visitors spend with her. I'm assuming that they sign in and then have to travel to a meeting room, then the guard would bring her in - they visit - then the visitor would have to travel back to the sign in sheet and sign out. I don't think the entire time would be spent with her.
 
I was able to obtain a tape of one of the KC / Counsel visits. While there was no sound......I made note of my observations......

KC: flipped hair 47 times, passed notes 3x, stomped feet and threw temper tantrum 5 x, placed hands over ears and shut her eyes and shook head side to side in "no" fashion 3x.

JB: looked at the ceiling 24 x, shrugged shoulders 574 x, stood up and threatened to leave 6 x, slammed laptop shut 5x.

So..................I think we can interpret how that visit went.

BTW..................I am just kidding. In the absence of any tapes to discuss......I thought I would provide an entertainment intermission.

:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:
 
http://www..com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/7.jpg

So...on 2/28 Baez makes a visit @ 10:22pm and stays for 2+ hours. Then Jose Garcia shows up the next morning and hangs around for another 1+ hour. Who is Jeanene Barrett that visited on 2/27 for 2 1/2 hours? (TIA, I prob should know this but I don't keep an eye on the visitor logs too often.)

I find these dates fascinating because of the timing in re. JS's order to keep the evidence under wraps. Of course, there may be nothing fascinating at all to these, it could simply be my paranoia in re. this case. lol
 
Jeanene Barrett is a mitigation specialist attorney from Chicago. Thanks Google.
 
Jeanene Barrett is a mitigation specialist attorney from Chicago. Thanks Google.

Thanks much! I should have googled it myself. :blushing: I saw another copy of this log and it had listed "attorney" by each entry (Baez, Garcia, Lyon, etc..), but nothing was by her name.
 
Jeanene Barrett is a mitigation specialist attorney from Chicago. Thanks Google.

I thought she was a social worker (not an atty) but working for the duhfense er defense. My understanding is her job is to find and confirm any "mitigating factors" that may keep KC from getting the dp. The many hours of interviewing kc (and spending the night) would be to gather info that may be relevant to her defense. (ie: provide bio-psycho-social/mental health issues) if someone has a different understanding of her role in this - I would love to be enlightened!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
164
Guests online
2,591
Total visitors
2,755

Forum statistics

Threads
603,762
Messages
18,162,658
Members
231,843
Latest member
lauraj333
Back
Top