long weekend break: discuss the latest here #102

[DairyGirl]

I don't know but I strongly suspect that MM knows a great deal about this crime. There was absolutely no reason for her to have called him as she was leaving Travis's house. The phone charger excuse is bull****.

Anyone recall the defense expert who was replaced by Samuels and left the case due to illness?

I know nothing about this but if it's true then I am sure he was sick. Sick of JA's lies.

 

[Southern_Meadow]

You may try to diminish the crime and call it "standard" compared to a handful of others. It is heinous. Appalling. Shocking. Cruel. It has nothing to do with religion or pix of private parts. Travis Alexander's murder is revolting and calculatedly sadistic.

Amen.

 

[Nosey Parker]

Somewhere I saw the number of calories the inmates are provided per day and, can't recall the figure, but I remember being surprised by its volume.

Yes, and just the one hot meal, right?
Breakfast and lunch are apparently combined in brown bag form.

That's what she is in such a hurry to get back to jail for? uke:

No wonder she is looking skinny.

 

[Dmacky]

Self-Defense
To succeed, a defendant arguing self defense must show that the killing resulted from a reasonable use of force to resist a reasonable fear of death or bodily harm. The defendant cannot have instigated the threatening situation. The degree of force used in self-defense must be proportional to the threat perceived, and the threat perceived must be something that would place a reasonable person in fear of death or great bodily harm. Mere words or insults do not suffice.
The defendant's reaction to the threat cannot take place after the threat of death or bodily harm has passed. Many states require that the defendant attempt to retreat or avoid danger if possible before resorting to the use of deadly force.
For example, if someone incapacitates a mugger with pepper spray, he or she may need to attempt to flee to safety instead of taking out a pistol and shooting the mugger. States differ in the degree to which they require an attempt to retreat if the threat they face occurs in the defender's home

And the Defenses "GOAL" is to raise reasonable doubt in the mind of the jurors. Her lawyers are using an affirmative defense to excuse or justify Jodi's criminal actions. This is what scares me a little bit. There is always a slight chance that at least "one juror" might feel some sympathy for JA and hold out for a 1st degree murder as opposed to the death penalty that is authorized by law in a Capital case. Just sayin

The burden of proof is MUCH LOWER for the defense because any affirmative defense that is raised by the defendant has to be proven by the weight of the evidence. Where as the burden of the prosecution is MUCH HIGHER. The State has to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Jodi committed premeditated first degree murder and that her self defense theory is all bullchit LIES.

I just hope the jury can see beyond all the sex, lies and audiotapes. We all know this whack job planned this entire murder. She was obsessed by TA. She wanted everything he had. She wanted to be his wife, and live his life. If she couldn't have him she was going to make damn sure nobody else had him.

 

[katiecoolady]

I don't understand this...can you please elaborate? TIA

OMG I just figured this out. lol A little gansta talk

I was concerned about that ONE question but one question in a sea of hundreds that support the State doesn't bother me. I could see a question like that coming in to cross the T's and dot the i's.

I was talking about more what I see visually in the courtroom. NONE of them are looking at her. There is some cheeky footage I've seen shown where it looks like she and Wilmott are watching a juror and having some kind of connection and smiling. I can guarantee you (as I was right there that day watching that whole deal go down) they were NOT engaging with a juror. Not sure what they were finding so amusing or whatever but it wasn't any kind of "look" or anything else w/ a juror. That's all I meant.

 

[katiecoolady]

Now that would be good.

There was that story of the expert who changed his mind on the stand. I can't find it off-hand but will keep looking.

Basically the prosecutor asked the expert if he'd had more information about the defendant and his wife (whom he killed), would he have changed his opinion? The doctor said yes. That's what I'm hoping for.

That was in OUR case. The defense expert Dr. Vincent DiMaio ended up flipping and identifying the defendant as the sole killer of my sister (although he wasn't the only one, just DiMaio tried to argue there was a sole killer and she flipped him to "if that's true then it's THIS one isn't it?" and he said "yes"). Thanks to the brilliant research and cross examination of our prosecutor the incomparable Catherine Hughes.

 

[elementary]

I don't recall Jodi having a gray beard and long salt and pepper hair.





Yeah, a JA trial on April Fools day would be too obvious to the jury. JMO



If I were a juror, while she was on the stand I would have looked her in the eye and smiled brightly and move my head like I'm intently listening. IMO, it might lead to her thinking her BS is selling and feel confident enough to make them larger. JMO



:goodpost:

I understand we all feel bad for TA's family, but she's right. There are a lot of worse murders out there. I think what's making people so angry is that it's always the current *advertiser censored* in the news.

So what? Is this not the one we are addressing and reacting to? There's always something worse out there. I don't see the point.

 

[ElleElle]

:welcome5:

I was in a motorbike accident in '04 (Thailand); suffered multiple facial and head fractures. Had 4 reconstructive surgeries.

And I remember it all too.

BTW...re: the Arias trial...I have PTSD as a result of a horrible car accident and I can tell you that I remember EVERY second of it.

 

[JRS_JD2L]

I'm sure this has been discussed but...
Were Travis' roommates gone all week until they discovered his body? I heard they believed he had already left for Mexico, but were they away those 5 days too? Did the roommate expected home at 6 pm on the 4th actually come home?
If they did come back during the 5 days before he was discovered, what about the laundry? Seems like they would have used the washer/ dryer at some point for their own laundry, yet Travis' laundry was left in both the washer and the dryer all that time.

The roommates, Zach and Enrique, were in and out all that week. There is a full breakdown in Flores's report about their whereabouts (and the laundry):

http://wildabouttrial.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Detective-Flores-Investigation-Report.pdf

This is kind of a bad scan, but it's the first one I found today. I know I've seen better copies in the ether. Perhaps someone can link to a clearer image?

 

[Harmony 2]

new thread is open... this thread will close in 10 minutes...

long weekend break: discuss the latest here #103 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

 

[vonnag]

Hello all.......learning my way around the site and am wondering if there is any information about the woman that sits behind the defense table? The woman that has been coming up to Jodi and the two of them wispering during sidebars and breaks. Maybe nothing but it has given me a bad feeling especially since the ribbon incident and the person who was made to leave the courtroom. Love this site by the way!!!

 

[Elley Mae]

Hello all.......learning my way around the site and am wondering if there is any information about the woman that sits behind the defense table? The woman that has been coming up to Jodi and the two of them wispering during sidebars and breaks. Maybe nothing but it has given me a bad feeling especially since the ribbon incident and the person who was made to leave the courtroom. Love this site by the way!!!

Welcome to Websleuths!

 

[Schuby]

Hello all.......learning my way around the site and am wondering if there is any information about the woman that sits behind the defense table? The woman that has been coming up to Jodi and the two of them wispering during sidebars and breaks. Maybe nothing but it has given me a bad feeling especially since the ribbon incident and the person who was made to leave the courtroom. Love this site by the way!!!

Welcome Vonnag, she is the mitigation specialist. Her job is, should Jodi be convicted of murder 1, to ke JA off death row.

 

[elementary]

I think he is just dishonest and incompetent. He didn't expect to be asked for his raw data. After all he had given them a "packet" with everything he thought they would need. <sarcasm>

So then he scrambled to make something up.

I think Samuels thought he would skate on his charm and projection of authority. He never expected to be asked for raw data, because as Wilmot said, what do attorneys know about raw data. The DT did not expect this, I'm thinking. Ha!

 

[VALee]

My guess is she will be more restrained than Samuels in trying to help Jodi, surely she watched his testimony and has no desire to become the punch line that he became by the end of cross.

Will be an interesting week :fence:

 

[Nosey Parker]

Hello all.......learning my way around the site and am wondering if there is any information about the woman that sits behind the defense table? The woman that has been coming up to Jodi and the two of them wispering during sidebars and breaks. Maybe nothing but it has given me a bad feeling especially since the ribbon incident and the person who was made to leave the courtroom. Love this site by the way!!!

:welcome4:

That is Arias' mitigation specialist.

 

[LambChop]

Somewhere I saw the number of calories the inmates are provided per day and, can't recall the figure, but I remember being surprised by its volume.

Wasn't it something like 2600 calories a day? I know they said the stew was made with soy (not meat). I would think that would cover everyone unless you had a soy allergy so that special meals do not have to be provided. jmo

 

[popsicle]

And the Defenses "GOAL" is to raise reasonable doubt in the mind of the jurors. Her lawyers are using an affirmative defense to excuse or justify Jodi's criminal actions. This is what scares me a little bit. There is always a slight chance that at least "one juror" might feel some sympathy for JA and hold out for a 1st degree murder as opposed to the death penalty that is authorized by law in a Capital case. Just sayin

The burden of proof is MUCH LOWER for the defense because any affirmative defense that is raised by the defendant has to be proven by the weight of the evidence. Where as the burden of the prosecution is MUCH HIGHER. The State has to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Jodi committed premeditated first degree murder and that her self defense theory is all bullchit LIES.

I just hope the jury can see beyond all the sex, lies and audiotapes. We all know this whack job planned this entire murder. She was obsessed by TA. She wanted everything he had. She wanted to be his wife, and live his life. If she couldn't have him she was going to make damn sure nobody else had him.

As JRS_JD2L posted here Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - long weekend break: discuss the latest here #102

all of you do not have to agree on whether it was &#8220;premeditated murder&#8221; or &#8220;felony murder.&#8221;

They don't all have to agree it is premeditated. Some can think it is and some can think it is 1st degree murder. In sentencing JA will still be facing the DP or LWOP.

 

[Dmacky]

And another thing that has been driving me crazy. She was living in N California and working at some seasonal restaurant < always a restaurant,.....And she just up and quits her job and moves to Mesa AFTER they break up? She told Flores it was because "plans were ALREADY in the works", and she was moving in with a friend. PLEASE. There were no plans. The girl she moved in with kicked her OUT after a week or so. She had NO where to live, NO job. She moved there because and only because she was OBSESSED with TA and she could watch/stalk his every move.

 

[VALee]

Hello all.......learning my way around the site and am wondering if there is any information about the woman that sits behind the defense table? The woman that has been coming up to Jodi and the two of them wispering during sidebars and breaks. Maybe nothing but it has given me a bad feeling especially since the ribbon incident and the person who was made to leave the courtroom. Love this site by the way!!!

Welcome :thewave: