eve carson
Verified Family - Joan Webster
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2006
- Messages
- 540
- Reaction score
- 717
For Tim Burke, was this incompetence or a deliberate diversion of the investigation?
There are a lot of examples I can point to, but there is one that makes the malfeasance obvious. Bear with a bit of repetition. I am uploading the article on November 28, 2006, announcing Burkes publication. Notice the highlighted area describing the gun alleged to force Joan on Paradisos boat. Note: Certified court records from CR 85-010-S affirmed the boat did not exist when Joan disappeared.
I have uploaded the excerpt froman FBI 302 report identifying what OConnell Seafood divers found in the water. Burke was in communication with SA Broce who initialed the report. Their communicationis confirmed in sworn affidavits by both men. Researching the activity of OConnells work at Pier 7, his divers found the item in 1980, not April of 1982 as Burke claimed.
Burke presented his find through Officer Nick Saggese during the Iannuzzi pretrial. He sent Saggese into the water in a specific spot Burke pointed out to come up with a fake gun on October 20, 1983. Assigned divers with equipment, still searching the water at Pier 7, just happened to miss this? Not a chance. This is an example of clear and deliberate obstruction, planted evidence.
There is no conceivable explanation to confuse these two items.
Tim Burke is complicit in Joans murder, an accessory after-the-fact. There is no statute of limitations for murder in MA. The case is solvable; there are some in the legal or law enforcement community that knew all along who was responsible.
There are a lot of examples I can point to, but there is one that makes the malfeasance obvious. Bear with a bit of repetition. I am uploading the article on November 28, 2006, announcing Burkes publication. Notice the highlighted area describing the gun alleged to force Joan on Paradisos boat. Note: Certified court records from CR 85-010-S affirmed the boat did not exist when Joan disappeared.
I have uploaded the excerpt froman FBI 302 report identifying what OConnell Seafood divers found in the water. Burke was in communication with SA Broce who initialed the report. Their communicationis confirmed in sworn affidavits by both men. Researching the activity of OConnells work at Pier 7, his divers found the item in 1980, not April of 1982 as Burke claimed.
Burke presented his find through Officer Nick Saggese during the Iannuzzi pretrial. He sent Saggese into the water in a specific spot Burke pointed out to come up with a fake gun on October 20, 1983. Assigned divers with equipment, still searching the water at Pier 7, just happened to miss this? Not a chance. This is an example of clear and deliberate obstruction, planted evidence.
There is no conceivable explanation to confuse these two items.
Tim Burke is complicit in Joans murder, an accessory after-the-fact. There is no statute of limitations for murder in MA. The case is solvable; there are some in the legal or law enforcement community that knew all along who was responsible.