Same mechanisms though.Just a reminder because people keep saying it was an Apple Watch and IT WAS NOT - it was the Heath App on his Iphone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Same mechanisms though.Just a reminder because people keep saying it was an Apple Watch and IT WAS NOT - it was the Heath App on his Iphone.
I wonder what the sidebar was at the end today? If there was audible arguing noted by court fellas would the judge share that with the attys? Idk, but it just struck me.I think they were not even close and lots of sparks flying in there. I am on the verge of thinking hung myself. I would think there would be a big incentive to stay and get it done if they thought they could.
I am hoping they reached a late afternoon verdict and are going home to sleep on it like so many juries tend to do.I find their leaving early today to be a signal that it is tough in that room and they are not close to a verdict. Most people if close would want to stay and try to finish this up today. I find this concerning and from the look on AJ's face so does he. His demeanor has really changed. Clearly there is disagreement amongst the jurors. I can't believe we start this again tomorrow. At this point I am expecting a note from the jurors.
But an iPhone is not worn, so if it was thrown it would not register steps.Same mechanisms though.
one thing is certain something will happen tomorrow..either a verdict or a note.I am hoping they reached a late afternoon verdict and are going home to sleep on it like so many juries tend to do.
Debatable.I just don't believe there is anything that has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt other than she was drunk.
Closings are not evidence. We need to stick with the evidence here, even if we disagree on what it means.
Closing arguments are not evidence and cannot be considered such.
IMO.
Same mechanisms though.
well true,,,no doubt better than than JO and she knew enough to get home to the children. It seems like these two drank a lot and fought when drinking..ie Aruba as one example. Neither seemed happy in the relationship at the end.Debatable.
She had several drinks but what was her tolerance?
I had a phenomenal capacity when I used to drink and I'm tiny. People, men mostly could not keep up with me.
They would collapse.
I never did, unfortunately.
Her blood C2h5Oh levels were not tested at the time.
@Curiousobserver, thank you, that is a thorough and well thought out list of evidence.In the interest of science...
-She was there- she is not disputing this
-She was several fold over the legal limit- she is not disputing this
-She was driving her car- she is not disputing this
-Prosecution showed that her car made a highly unsafe backup maneuver recorded by the EDS system that she should know is unsafe; this is the intent (I don't buy the keystroke argument about the count, I trust the mileage argument)
-Her tail light is at the scene (disputed, but testified they were under the snow not on top of it which is difficult to fake without detection by bystanders)
-His DNA is on the tail light (I don't buy the touch DNA argument, nobody touches their girlfriend's tail light, and I don't buy the transfer from the blood in the cups argument. If someone planted this there would be micrograms of his DNA, not nanograms of his DNA). The fact that there is very little DNA is more incriminating, not less.
-Pieces of the tail light are on his clothes
-His phone GPS suggests he was in the exact same spot all night
-Karen Read even thinks hitting him was a reasonable explanation and shouted it in front of multiple witnesses.
-The FBI provided 3000 pages from their investigation to the defense, including Grand Jury Testimony and the only thing they found that they could use that might be exculpatory were some guys firing a glass at the tail light with a pneumatic cannon.
-After seeing what the FBI found the Judge allowed the trial to move forward, subjecting Karen to the possibility of conviction and prison.
-No dog DNA on the swabs from his clothes (you would expect some if he laid on the floor in their house or was attacked by the dog even if they didn't swab the exact spot where she bit)
-Chloe is only in Vermont and is apparently alive and well (it would have been easy for the defense to get a bite impressions but they didn't; it would have been foolish for the prosecution to do it because they would be handing the defense credibility and an easy way to confuse the Jury on cross examination, allowing upteen experts to come in and refute them)
-If they wanted to hide chloe they would have had her put down and cremated
Just randomly I checked my step count and stairs climbed on my Fitbit vs my iPhone. I don’t expect either are 100% accurate, there’s always room for error.
But my Fitbit, worn on my left wrist has 4x the amount of steps today than my phone does.
It has 3x the amount of flights climbed. (And these are actual stairs I did go up and down today)
Of course Fitbit is constantly worn whereas my phone isn’t, but today I was especially glued to my phone and carried it with me in my left hand probably 90% of the time I was moving today.
This means absolutely nothing especially since two different systems but I thought it was interesting.
Thank you for the link. I watched the first part and only saw KR's Lexus at JO's house, not at the sallyport. Lally mumbles so much I had a hard time hearing his questions but I never heard him say anything about how the taillight looked at the sallyport. Was it later on in the link, and do you know approximately where?
And it was snowing. Or it was about to snow.I just don't believe there is anything that has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt other than she was drunk.
Any device that counts steps that is wearable is always more reliable compared to a phone in a pocket, even if you kept the phone in your hand the entire time.Just randomly I checked my step count and stairs climbed on my Fitbit vs my iPhone. I don’t expect either are 100% accurate, there’s always room for error.
But my Fitbit, worn on my left wrist has 4x the amount of steps today than my phone does.
It has 3x the amount of flights climbed. (And these are actual stairs I did go up and down today)
Of course Fitbit is constantly worn whereas my phone isn’t, but today I was especially glued to my phone and carried it with me in my left hand probably 90% of the time I was moving today.
This means absolutely nothing especially since two different systems but I thought it was interesting.
Are you sure? Gonna need a source for that.And it was snowing. Or it was about to snow.
Any device that counts steps that is wearable is always more reliable compared to a phone in a pocket, even if you kept the phone in your hand the entire time.