Universecalling
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2024
- Messages
- 422
- Reaction score
- 5,090
I only looked at the facts. What does make sense is physics and science.one interview she talks about him going to the "side door" and then she looked down at her phone and didn't see anything else... the other interview she talks about seeing him go to the "door" and "put his head inside" then she leaves.
not huge discrepancies, but her stories don't really make a lot of sense. she was waiting for him or not? she just left? she saw him go in? she didn't? and then she started screaming into the phone... and texting like crazy?
what IS obvious is that - unless you believe all of those other folks were lying about her morning reactions - she is lying. no person on the planet (given either of those stories she told) would believe she then thought she might've hit and kill him with her SUV or he was killed by a plow (because he didn't answer his phone)!??!!?
it doesn't make a single bit of sense.
i know people love the conspiracy plots - but none of them explain this.
* as an aside, I'm surprised these tapes weren't introduced as evidence. I'll continue to say the prosecution in this case was so, so out of his depth.
Throw away everything except math and you got your answer.
And no, I don’t mean trooper Paul’s math.