I have not watched all 23 days, maybe about 1/2 now. Some of the key people I have watch over and over again. Since timeline differs so much between people. Also watch some pundits summaries. This is a real long case, and so many people involved. I am sure I have forgotten parts of it.
I believe KR told Jen that she had dropped JO at the bar when she first called her in the morning, and then was told by Jen and her husband over the phone, that they had seen her car at the party.
I saw the play fighting of BA and BH, so drunk and testosterone was flowing for sure. But, I thought two people saw them both going to party, in route. The people that went to pick up that girl.
Oh....I dont think that was damage from a car....
OH...I understand now. Yes, maybe even KR told JO about Higgins....to make him jealous.
Watching the entire Waterfall video. Higgins calling over to JO and KR down by the bar. C. Albert grabbing his arm. Looked very clear to me that Higgins then threw JO the finger. He was AGGITATED. Things were not going the way he thought as he texted KR that night, there maybe, about tonight? Hmmm. ASKING her a question about him and her or her and John, appearing happily together. Alcohol and ego and prob had let C. Albert know what transpired between KR and himself. Ego like that and feeling KR flaunting her and JO in his face , well, . Horrible night, split minute decisions. KR was def NOT going into that house but never imagined it would be such a horrible event as it was.
Would you have a link to this particular video of the Waterfall please?
No, I do not but you can google that and I am sure it will turn up . ALSO C. ALBERT.. MAIN PLAYER.
What would I google though? There were a bunch of Waterfall videos that were shown, but I think they were all different times.
I feel like this theory covers a lot of what is confusing about this, and I personally can see this as similar to the way it really happened. One thing about it though that does raise more questions: in this scenario, the people in the house (or at least someone in the house) would know about Chloe attacking JO, right? But they left him out there anyway, hoping it looked like he got hit by a car or plow? What did they think investigators would think about the evidence of dog injuries on his arm? Did no one think that would be a problem? Maybe they were just too drunk to worry about the details. Or maybe they relied on their pull w/LE, being cops themselves. Maybe they thought the arm injuries would just look like more vehicle accident wounds. They may have looked different at first and not so obviously dog-related (imo). So the theory can still stand, imo, because there are several ways they may not have seen this as a problem later, but it did still sound like they should have to me.
IIRC...the hearing I heard was about his shirt, and thought they mentioned dog DNA. Probably had more then one hearing on DNA discovery issues.
Just John O'Keefe/Waterfall/Canton should bring it up.. prob a few or more recopied of course. It is from the bar that night..bit grainy and black white. but check them out.
I thought there was evidence shown in court that her vehicle data showed that the only time it did a fast reverse was AFTER the cops had it towed into their garage and it was no longer in KR's possession. Like the cops had done the reverse themselves while testing it, trying to recreate what may have happened that night. It was in the "key cycle" (or ignition cycle) chart.
Yes, true.
If anyone can point me to the spot in the Waterfall video that @keek has referred to or link it, that would be appreciated. I've watched several clips during the trial, none of which pointed out Higgins giving the finger, and I'm not able to search the entire video right now. Thank you.
I posted links to the video during the trial, and they were nuked because the videos are posted by unapproved sources (turleboy). It's one of those things you have to go find yourself.
