Maat99
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2011
- Messages
- 217
- Reaction score
- 2,420
Thanks. I’m looking for a source that provides evidence photos of the tail light prior to sally port arrival.
Library and welfare check aren’t true crime scene evidence photos. They are screenshots of videos. They aren’t clear, precise, nor sharp. There’s no clarity.
You stated before that there are plenty of evidence photos of the light prior to arrival at sally port.
That is what I was looking for.
Why do you think there are no “true crime scene” photos of the light prior to the sally port video? Doesn’t taking picture of the damage to the vehicle you believe ran someone down sound like SOP? Especially if that is your primary evidence that a murder occurred? You seem to expect that those should exist in order to prove the state of the taillight. Hmm.
Who is responsible for providing photos that prove the light was damaged when KR left BAs house?
Instead of conclusive proof which could have been easily obtained and should have been SOP, we are left with testimony from KR and an officer at the scene when her vehicle was seized. BOTH of them stated that the taillight was not smashed. How is that NOT reasonable doubt??