MISTRIAL MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #18

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Bishop Black

Former Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Messages
566
Reaction score
1,226

Karen Read has been charged with second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter and leaving the scene of a collision in the January 2022 death of her off-duty Boston Police Officer boyfriend John O'Keefe outside a Canton, Mass., home.

She's pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Leading up to his death, the couple of two years reportedly spent the night drinking and bar hopping with friends before Read, 43, dropped O'Keefe, 46, off at the home of a fellow off-duty police officer for an after-party, PEOPLE previously reported.

Prosecutors say as O'Keefe exited the vehicle, Read allegedly proceeded to make a three-point turn during a winter storm, striking her boyfriend in the process before driving off.

After O'Keefe failed to return home hours later, Read allegedly went looking for him, before finding his body in a snowbank outside the home where she allegedly left him.


Karen-Read-and-John-OKeefe-8c0b529e6823492aaf409a1c96c15ccc.jpg


john-okeefe-police-officer-dd6a844c30fa4341b2dba22774525391.jpg


Thread #1Thread #2 Thread #3Thread #4 Thread #5 Thread #6 Thread #7 Thread #8 Thread #9 Thread #10 Thread #11 Thread #12 Thread #13 Thread #14 Thread #15 Thread #16 Thread #17
 
Last edited by a moderator:

I would not exactly call the extraneous pieces of glass found on the Lexis bumper and the pieces of tail light that did not fit the reconstruction "smoke and mirrors". They were real evidence analyzed by CW and presented at trial with no explanation.
 

I would not exactly call the extraneous pieces of glass found on the Lexis bumper and the pieces of tail light that did not fit the reconstruction "smoke and mirrors". They were real evidence analyzed by CW and presented at trial with no explanation.
...and that injuries were not consistent with hit in any manner by a vehicle, per the expert reconstructionist, which of course, is his profession and experience of many, many pedestrian vehicle strikes upon a person. Ahhh, the list goes on and on. Would of had to watch the trial with the experts, not the State of MA ones, but the outside professionals, but, some may not have had that interest, just a solid fact of their own, for whatever reason that would be.
 
...and that injuries were not consistent with hit in any manner by a vehicle, per the expert reconstructionist, which of course, is his profession and experience of many, many pedestrian vehicle strikes upon a person. Ahhh, the list goes on and on. Would of had to watch the trial with the experts, not the State of MA ones, but the outside professionals, but, some may not have had that interest, just a solid fact of their own, for whatever reason that would be.
And IIRC Dr. Sheridan, a witness for the defense also testified about the nature of the victim’s injuries - and the absence of some key specific injuries one might have expected to be present from a vehicle strike - as theorized by the CW prosecution. And he also testified that the injuries that JOK received were not consistent with a vehicle strike. His testimony and courtroom testimony are up thread but I won’t be able to locate them now. MOO
 
Geez...

It's JOK's right arm wounds that the CW chose to ignore, thanks to the non-existent investigation by the Canton PD, the MSP and the DA that sealed the deal for me. They absolutely did NOT come from a vehicles tail light shattering, dancing and somehow suspended in time mid-air to cause the symmetrical bloodied and gory lines on his arms. Come On People!!

It's similar to the character of "Danny" from 'The Shining' by S King. The child couldn't bear seeing ghosts and gouls and blood and gore, so he covered his eyes and screamed " Not There!!!" until the apparitions disappeared

From the ME on down, including the family of JOK.. those negligent people ignored his wounds. They figuratively put a cover over his arm and said "you don't see this". "Do not discuss this" "Do not investigate this".

Yannetti and Co said oh hell no ! You guys are going to look at this.

How does a dog mauled arm fit into a hit and run by KR ? It doesn't.

Jurors got this right. Shame upon the courts in MA. Wasting tax payer money, risking Double Jeopardy for KR, only because they can't handle the truth.
 
Geez...

It's JOK's right arm wounds that the CW chose to ignore, thanks to the non-existent investigation by the Canton PD, the MSP and the DA that sealed the deal for me. They absolutely did NOT come from a vehicles tail light shattering, dancing and somehow suspended in time mid-air to cause the symmetrical bloodied and gory lines on his arms. Come On People!!

It's similar to the character of "Danny" from 'The Shining' by S King. The child couldn't bear seeing ghosts and gouls and blood and gore, so he covered his eyes and screamed " Not There!!!" until the apparitions disappeared

From the ME on down, including the family of JOK.. those negligent people ignored his wounds. They figuratively put a cover over his arm and said "you don't see this". "Do not discuss this" "Do not investigate this".

Yannetti and Co said oh hell no ! You guys are going to look at this.

How does a dog mauled arm fit into a hit and run by KR ? It doesn't.

Jurors got this right. Shame upon the courts in MA. Wasting tax payer money, risking Double Jeopardy for KR, only because they can't handle the truth.
Spectacularly said and so sadly.
 
And let's not even bring up the blood that was seen to have dripped DOWN JO's shirts. How does that happen if you are hit by a car and thrown in the air and land horizontal on the ground???
Yes, down his back and chest area, flowed downward, from his head and facial injuries. No harm done to his body otherwise, than the bite and claw marks, which matched the holes in his shirt from the outside. claw points and teeth points about his elbow area where the dog clamped on when the dog jumped up on him. His arm, where he tried to deflect that dog. The dog that was sent away in some condition, but NOT at the Alberts house anymore. Oh such terrible evil of attempting to hide and look over there these people did. Life is meaningless to them, just theirs.
 
LOL date on that interview?? I know 20/20 or 48 hrs or one of those just ran it, BUT

It was way before the trial.
 
9/9/2024


LIVE! Karen Read SPEAKS OUT - 20/20 Recap And Reaction - Will This Affect Trial 2?​

 
LOL date on that interview?? I know 20/20 or 48 hrs or one of those just ran it, BUT

It was way before the trial.
Yes, it was old, splashed up a bit with a couple new bits. So, it was meaningless information before so much was discovered and submitted, TIME has gone by and things changed a lot. Not some people known to the O'K's as somehow they are not listening to the professionals and thinking, the mind works differently for some people. Lots has come to the surface, especially the involvement with the FBI towards the lead investigator who is out of his position due to his morally and professionally illegal behavior in uniform and during his investigation . ALL his prior investigations for the state are now being sifted through for any of his same behavior. Remember he and his wife are close friends for LONG time with the Albert family who are going about their lives for now. He is not. No smoke there, he is simple toast, nicely done. Do not know if that all was discovered at the time of that junky show, that used to be reputable, about Proctor and the FBI investigations regarding the cover up and the ones all involved that were LE Or D.A. It was an old info program. NOT factual news, but pretty much was to be looked at as entertainment, unfortunately, so people not informed at all, took as updated facts. It was along the lines of faux news.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
200
Guests online
3,119
Total visitors
3,319

Forum statistics

Threads
603,857
Messages
18,164,476
Members
231,874
Latest member
verydemureverycute
Back
Top