That isn’t what happened. Not sure why you would misrepresent the testimony and evidence. If it was accidental you should delete.The defense manufactured so much drama around the actual ORIGINAL NON-manipulated mirrored video ….they now asked to show a “doctored” video they inverted.
Sigh….
Not only did they not take any pictures of the passenger tail light, they did everything possible to make sure there were no pictures available or video that could be enlarged to show it. The MSP and Canton PD did their best to keep it out of view entirely.I'd still like an answer as to why ZERO PICTURES of this car were taken prior to being towed or when it was dropped off at the sally port.
The defense and many of Reads supporters implied the CW had doctored / flipped the video to deliberately mislead the jurorsThat isn’t what happened. Not sure why you would misrepresent the testimony and evidence. If it was accidental you should delete.
The media called it a "doctored" video.The defense manufactured so much drama around the actual ORIGINAL NON-manipulated mirrored video ….they now asked to show a “doctored” video they inverted.
Sigh….
They're off in the ether, along with the 42 minutes of sallyport video.I'd still like an answer as to why ZERO PICTURES of this car were taken prior to being towed or when it was dropped off at the sally port.