Wishbone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
- Messages
- 3,899
- Reaction score
- 18,750
It is painful and frustrating to watch this. The only thing that would make her bias more blatant is if she doesn't allow these witnesses to testify. JMOO
MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #7
- Thread starter Bishop Black
- Start date
- Status
housewife
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2019
- Messages
- 1,205
- Reaction score
- 9,884
arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
@JHall7news
Witness insists the video is an accurate depiction of movement within the Canton PD sally port around defendant's SUV. Jackson continues to question the detective about how this can be accurate when it's inverted and right is left, and left is right. Bukhenik won't budge.
Jackson is now going into how long the surveillance video is...he has claimed there are big gaps, missing portions of the video. Pretrial, prosecutor Lally said that's because the camera is motion activated.
Witness insists the video is an accurate depiction of movement within the Canton PD sally port around defendant's SUV. Jackson continues to question the detective about how this can be accurate when it's inverted and right is left, and left is right. Bukhenik won't budge.
Jackson is now going into how long the surveillance video is...he has claimed there are big gaps, missing portions of the video. Pretrial, prosecutor Lally said that's because the camera is motion activated.
housewife
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2019
- Messages
- 1,205
- Reaction score
- 9,884
Yeah, I'd say it's "not a smooth recording of events", Sgt Bukenhik.
"It's not missing, it's just not recording" ??
He is making himself look worse and worse.
I heard the jurors are laughing, but I need to verify.
"It's not missing, it's just not recording" ??
He is making himself look worse and worse.
I heard the jurors are laughing, but I need to verify.
arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
nodamselindistress
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2020
- Messages
- 2,413
- Reaction score
- 26,114
Good grief, a Mass State Police Lt believes a mirrored video is an accurate depiction! Good luck to the State of Mass if that is how they all think.
MyJoey
Verified Family ~ Joseph “Joey” Ressler III
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2016
- Messages
- 1,030
- Reaction score
- 8,227
Law and crime I’m watching it on, starts at 9. I have to mow today so I’ll be playing catch up and watching parts live as I can.
kittythehare
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
- Messages
- 18,562
- Reaction score
- 109,052
Elliot_Alderson
Well-Known Idiot
Hilarious too that the CW argues that the defense presenting witnesses is "trial by ambush" yet what is that sallyport video? OH, it's an ACCURATE DESCRIPTION??! Truly laughable. JMO
housewife
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2019
- Messages
- 1,205
- Reaction score
- 9,884
The jury is paying no close attention? Probably a typo.
Unless they realize it's easy to flip a video and they are just waiting for the unedited version to be shown?
I'm concerned because some on the jury might not understand because of their age.
arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
Another reporter's perspective straight from the courtroom:
Defense attorney David Yannetti raises his voice as he says he needs to be heard on this, steps to the lectern. The judge seems to be annoyed by his demeanor, reminds him she is the person he is trying to convince on this issue.
"This is the hyperbole I don't need," Judge Beverly Cannone tells Yannetti, who replies his integrity has been attacked and he needs to defend himself.
Yannetti says this motion comes on top of the video the prosecution presented last week.
The prosecution is also seeking more info about the opinions to be expressed by defense witness Chris Van Ee, an expert in biomedical and mechanical engineering. Judge says defense needs to give prosecution more info by the end of Tues about how he came to his conclusions.
The defense says it wants to call three witnesses who took part in the federal investigation. Says it has never coordinated with them about their testimony. Judge says the three will need to be evaluated in a hearing this week. Same goes for Dr. Marie Russell, she says.
Judge says this looks like "at least a day of voir dire" to learn more about these defense witnesses. The judge reminds attorneys she told the jury they'd likely get case by last week of June. Yannetti says hearing will take "about two hours”.
Judge says they will have a hearing later this week to hear from the defense witnesses without the jury. The judge will then decide if they can testify.
The judge seems annoyed at the possibility of another delay. She calls a recess while the jury is brought in and today's testimony begins.
Sgt. Yuriy Bukhenik returns to the stand. Defense attorney Alan Jackson resumes cross-examination about the video of Read's SUV at the Canton Police Department. Bukhenik confirms the person seen slipping in front of the vehicle is the tow truck driver.
Jackson is asking where Tpr. Michael Proctor appears in the video. Bukhenik says he cannot e sure where Proctor is.
Jackson: You did not mention that this video is inverted, did you? Bukhenik: It did not come up.
Jackson: Do you agree with me that an inverted video is not accurate? Bukhenik continues to insist it is an accurate representation of what happened.
After a sidebar, the judge tells the jury that both sides have agreed to when the video starts and stops. Jackson resumes questioning and says about 2/3 of the video is missing. Bukhenik says, "It was never there. It was never recorded.”
Jackson asks if Bukhenik notices that some people appear out of nowhere in the video? Bukhenik says the video is triggered by motion. "It's not missing. It just wasn't recorded," Bukhenik says.
Jackson asks Bukhenik about timestamp on video. Bukhenik says he can't see it. Judge asks Bukhenik to get up and go closer to the screen. Back on the stand, Bukhenik agrees that the timestamp is 5:38:07pm.
Sidebar. Judge excuses jury. Sidebar continues.
@BienickWCVB
Defense attorney David Yannetti raises his voice as he says he needs to be heard on this, steps to the lectern. The judge seems to be annoyed by his demeanor, reminds him she is the person he is trying to convince on this issue.
"This is the hyperbole I don't need," Judge Beverly Cannone tells Yannetti, who replies his integrity has been attacked and he needs to defend himself.
Yannetti says this motion comes on top of the video the prosecution presented last week.
The prosecution is also seeking more info about the opinions to be expressed by defense witness Chris Van Ee, an expert in biomedical and mechanical engineering. Judge says defense needs to give prosecution more info by the end of Tues about how he came to his conclusions.
The defense says it wants to call three witnesses who took part in the federal investigation. Says it has never coordinated with them about their testimony. Judge says the three will need to be evaluated in a hearing this week. Same goes for Dr. Marie Russell, she says.
Judge says this looks like "at least a day of voir dire" to learn more about these defense witnesses. The judge reminds attorneys she told the jury they'd likely get case by last week of June. Yannetti says hearing will take "about two hours”.
Judge says they will have a hearing later this week to hear from the defense witnesses without the jury. The judge will then decide if they can testify.
The judge seems annoyed at the possibility of another delay. She calls a recess while the jury is brought in and today's testimony begins.
Sgt. Yuriy Bukhenik returns to the stand. Defense attorney Alan Jackson resumes cross-examination about the video of Read's SUV at the Canton Police Department. Bukhenik confirms the person seen slipping in front of the vehicle is the tow truck driver.
Jackson is asking where Tpr. Michael Proctor appears in the video. Bukhenik says he cannot e sure where Proctor is.
Jackson: You did not mention that this video is inverted, did you? Bukhenik: It did not come up.
Jackson: Do you agree with me that an inverted video is not accurate? Bukhenik continues to insist it is an accurate representation of what happened.
After a sidebar, the judge tells the jury that both sides have agreed to when the video starts and stops. Jackson resumes questioning and says about 2/3 of the video is missing. Bukhenik says, "It was never there. It was never recorded.”
Jackson asks if Bukhenik notices that some people appear out of nowhere in the video? Bukhenik says the video is triggered by motion. "It's not missing. It just wasn't recorded," Bukhenik says.
Jackson asks Bukhenik about timestamp on video. Bukhenik says he can't see it. Judge asks Bukhenik to get up and go closer to the screen. Back on the stand, Bukhenik agrees that the timestamp is 5:38:07pm.
Sidebar. Judge excuses jury. Sidebar continues.
@BienickWCVB
arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
Leilei
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2009
- Messages
- 3,354
- Reaction score
- 11,851
The judge doesn't appear to be leaving the bench, though. IMO.
ETA It's a sidebar, so Her Honor is present.
- Status