snowpea666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2020
- Messages
- 489
- Reaction score
- 1,762
Maddie suspect could be cleared of Irish woman's rape as DNA doesn’t match Well well, this is not good !
The problem is, if you ask me "did you call this person on this number at this time 13 years ago" - there is no way I can testify to that, unless I have some way to place it based on other events. There would need to be something very specific to place the call.
Why is it not good? surely if he's innocent it's good that he's cleared.....Maddie suspect could be cleared of Irish woman's rape as DNA doesn’t match Well well, this is not good !
Interesting.Maddie suspect could be cleared of Irish woman's rape as DNA doesn’t match Well well, this is not good !
What I mean is it is not good for HB that she may not get closure, I don't know what DNA they had as I thought all that was destroyed by PLE ? Potential DNA evidence from a rape which the victim believes may have been committed by the Madeleine McCann suspect was destroyed on the orders of Portuguese prosecutors DNA from rape victim believes may have been Madeleine McCann suspect destroyedWhy is it not good? surely if he's innocent it's good that he's cleared.....
So the evidence that the number was CB and thus placing him in PdL that earlier that evening, is basically this note in a diary?
No wonder they need the other person on the call.
Interesting.
Two totally different rapists in the Algarve at the time, both with the same modus operandi.
Two soul mates.
What I mean is it is not good for HB that she may not get closure, I don't know what DNA they had as I thought all that was destroyed by PLE ? Potential DNA evidence from a rape which the victim believes may have been committed by the Madeleine McCann suspect was destroyed on the orders of Portuguese prosecutors DNA from rape victim believes may have been Madeleine McCann suspect destroyed
Super, you should have placed a soft cushion to go with your chair!Please apologise, but whenever i read the term:
"A source close to the investigation....",
my heartrate slows down and i need a good coffee, not to sleep away instantly.
Supplementary i'm still waiting for FF's bombshell, because meanwhile my buttocks hurt so much, due to the long sitting and holding tight on my chair, as much as i can.
Super, you should have placed a soft cushion to go with your chair!
Herr Fülscher's announced revelation may never come.
The problem is, if you ask me "did you call this person on this number at this time 13 years ago" - there is no way I can testify to that, unless I have some way to place it based on other events. There would need to be something very specific to place the call.
But you would have something to place it based on other events. The day after there would have been the major news story that a child had disappeared. There would have been the added detail that they were abducted from a place where you'd been calling.The problem is, if you ask me "did you call this person on this number at this time 13 years ago" - there is no way I can testify to that, unless I have some way to place it based on other events. There would need to be something very specific to place the call.
I'm not sure, Super. Just a hunch. He probably announced the revelation because he didn't mean revealing it but rather pressing for some negotiation.
Of course a source Super-solicitor can't tell.
Two trips to PDL means CB already opened his mouth and is cooperating.
No Super-solicitor would do that for an uncooperative client.
Neither CB nor any of his friends are choir boys. We know CB committed crimes. What we want to know is if he's connected to MM's disappearance. Circumstantial evidence can be very strong evidence when all joined together. Most crime are solved that way.