Agreed. IMO, I think they have more than enough to convince themselves of CB's guilt, but while they have time to build a stronger case it certainly makes sense to do so. To avoid a conviction, defence lawyers don't need to prove innocence, they just have to create enough doubt that each piece of the prosecution evidence could be explained by something else. The phone call: someone else had the phone. The confession: unreliable witness, perhaps it was really them who did it. A photo: someone else took it etc etc.
Would phone cameras have been that good in 2007?
As in the evidence that CB sexually abused a dog for example. (scratch marks?) It was reported that this footage originated from CB's Casio Exilim or the SD cards that were used in that camera. I don't think the flash is from a phone cam, but it could well be from the Exilim
He was reportedly 'very fond' of the sheep in Foral. Not sure exactly what was meant by that, but sure, no evidence of bestiality exists, although we do know he abused his dogs in other ways.
I think I can see the letter "M" in the sand?
The 3 finger nightime salute pic of CB. Could only screenshoot from a Google 'cb maddie Der Spiegel 'search (IMG now removed). The front wheel arch to the upper right has a blur/something I can't make out - looks like a head of hair and eyes from some angles (sorry if this is bizarre/disturbing). Are CBs shoes and ankle area of pants muddy/dusty or is it the camera light. Assuming 3rd/4th May Also, was he working that night in restaurant as some may have suggested, or could this be dressed smartly to avoid attention/blend in as a worker finishing his shift. Sure this has already been mentioned though.
