I guess if it seems okay for a prosecutor, it might as well sound flimsy to yousounds a bit flimsy to me.
jokes aside, why does it sound flimsy to you?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess if it seems okay for a prosecutor, it might as well sound flimsy to yousounds a bit flimsy to me.
It applies to the investgation stage too;Presumption of innocence applies only in Court. The prosecutor does not presume innocence - indeed the opposite.
It applies to the investgation stage too;
However, the principle of presumption of innocence does not prevent the authorities from informing the public about criminal investigations in progress, but it requires that they do so with all the discretion and circumspection necessary if the presumption of innocence is to be respected
Prosecutors must mind their language;
371. Article 6 § 2 prohibits statements by public officials about pending criminal investigations which encourage the public to believe the suspect guilty and prejudge the assessment of the facts by the competent judicial authority
Interesting that no MSM have followed up on the Metro article yet. Could it be because they all ‘revealed’, after a Sun ‘exclusive’, that funding would be pulled earlier this year?Scotland Yard's Madeleine McCann investigation extended for another year
The three-year-old's parents have never given up hope that she will one day be found alive.metro.co.uk
The British investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann is being continued for another year by the Metropolitan Police.
Reports had suggested that Operation Grange would be wound down this autumn with the end of its funding as the circumstances of the three-year-old’s disappearance 15 years ago remain unsolved.
Scotland Yard has been assisting the Portuguese authorities investigating how she vanished from a holiday apartment in Praia da Luz.
The British detectives were set to wind down their 11-year involvement in the case, according to reports in March 2022.
However, Scotland Yard has now confirmed in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOI) request that the case has received funding to continue until March 2023.
Christian Brueckner, who is currently in a German prison for a number of sex and drug offences, was named by prosecutors in the country as a chief suspect in June 2020.
A subsequent request for the current 12 months has now been granted, according to the reply provided by the Met Police.
The response stated: ‘I have contacted the Operation Grange Team and in response to your question regarding Operation Grange being closed, they have advised that an application for further funding was submitted and authorised by the Home Office earlier this year.
‘This funding runs until March 2023. Regular reviews between the MPS and the Home Office continue to take place throughout the year. Operation Grange remains open at this present time.’...........
More interested in the tory infighting.Interesting that no MSM have followed up on the Metro article yet. Could it be because they all ‘revealed’, after a Sun ‘exclusive’, that funding would be pulled earlier this year?
What court? Do they have to have the permission of a judge every time HWC speaks?Yes - I have made this argument all along - but the Court has allowed it, for reasons we are not privy to.
IMO it's most likely, that the joint forces made a descision not to talk to the media anymore, according to the upcoming actions.Interesting that no MSM have followed up on the Metro article yet. Could it be because they all ‘revealed’, after a Sun ‘exclusive’, that funding would be pulled earlier this year?
At least, in Germany, there is no risk of pre-trial publicity prejudicing the outcome of any trial, because trials are both heard and decided by judges, I'm sure, deemed sufficiently rigorous and impartial not to allow their judgements to be influenced by pre-trial publicity. Exactly the same is true in England where, for example, someone convicted in a Magistrate's court appeals to the Court of Appeal, or where a Crown Court Appeal judge presides. In those instances, the rules of sub judice don't apply and full reporting rights are allowed, so long as the reporting is fair, complete and factual.Yes - I have made this argument all along - but the Court has allowed it, for reasons we are not privy to.
At least, in Germany, there is no risk of pre-trial publicity prejudicing the outcome of any trial, because trials are both heard and decided by judges, I'm sure, deemed sufficiently rigorous and impartial not to allow their judgements to be influenced by pre-trial publicity. Exactly the same is true in England where, for example, someone convicted in a Magistrate's court appeals to the Court of Appeal, or where a Crown Court Appeal judge presides. In those instances, the rules of sub judice don't apply and full reporting rights are allowed, so long as the reporting is fair, complete and factual.
There is the further point that Brueckner, irrespective of his guilt or innocence of crimes against Madeleine, simply has no reputation to defend, currently serving a prison sentence for a brutal rape and with a string of other offences against children.
Still a few weeks to go, but the engine is running...Suspect examined for physical features
8 July 2022, 13:56 UhrRead time: 1 min
Braunschweig (dpa) - In the investigation against the suspect also in the Maddie case, another step has been completed. Hans Christian Wolters of the public prosecutor's office in Braunschweig told the Deutsche Presse-Agentur on Friday that the suspect had been subjected to an identification procedure. During such a measure, photos are essentially taken and possible special features such as scars, tattoos or birthmarks are recorded, explained the press spokesman of the prosecuting authority.
A few weeks ago, the newspaper "Bild" had reported that the 45-year-old had agreed to a corresponding examination. The photos and information obtained are to be compared, among other things, with descriptions of the perpetrators by witnesses, as public prosecutor Wolters said. The German is not only in the focus in the case of the British girl Madeleine McCann, who disappeared in Portugal in 2007. Christian B. is also being investigated for other sexual offences, including two cases of abuse and three allegations of rape.
The 45-year-old is currently serving a sentence of several years in Oldenburg for the rape of a US-American woman in 2005 in Praia da Luz, Portugal, where about one and a half years later the then three-year-old Maddie disappeared from an apartment complex. With regard to the alleged sexual offences, a period of admission is currently still running, during which the defence lawyer can comment on the accusations, as prosecutor Wolters said. After that, follow-up investigations may follow before a decision on charges can be made.
Verdächtigter auf körperliche Merkmale untersucht
www.sueddeutsche.de
The suspect's defence lawyer, Friedrich Fülscher, told dpa that he had not yet received the results of the identification service. Therefore, he could not comment on the investigative measure. Overall, there is still no statement from the defence on the various accusations against Christian B..
(it is from today, German press agency and also 3 rapes are mentioned)
© dpa-infocom, dpa:220708-99-955122/3
Interesting - this is a much more straight down the line press drop, via DPA that then goes to news platforms.
Maybe the media circus is over.
Why would he? The victim never specified that this was a scar, birth mark, or tattoo that she saw. It won't add anything if he doesn't have one nor would the case against him be mute."A few weeks ago, the newspaper "Bild" had reported that the 45-year-old had agreed to a corresponding examination".
Wouldn't be expected CB to be more concerned, nervous? Even "refusing" the examination?!
The media this summer have Wimbledon, who's who in the royal box, who's wearing what, will the bad boy of tennis win,It's something concrete, at least, evidence of ongoing activity as far as the other charges are concerned.
Re the media circus, as ever, time will tell.