Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect #30

[onemoremiletogo]

Why would he? The victim never specified that this was a scar, birth mark, or tattoo that she saw. It won't add anything if he doesn't have one nor would the case against him be mute.

Eta. He is a dangerous individual who thinks he can never be caught. Why would his stance change? He enjoys his fame.

I'm assuming he should be at least aware of the potential progress of the cases against him. Specified or not by the victims, "allowing" the examination could always bring him more risk and it will accumulate "physical" data that, could then be "easily" used against him. Or at least, be available and ready to be "processed".

 

[Anxala]

The media this summer have Wimbledon, who's who in the royal box, who's wearing what, will the bad boy of tennis win,
PM's resignation, who'll replace him .
Love island , etc,etc
Scars or not on a German is the least interesting imo .

For sure, but Summer Silly Season aside, there's absolutely nothing about the current stage of this investigation that would be likely to attract media attention anyway since it has nothing to do with MM.

She's the news generator, not CB.

When/if she seriously and concretely becomes the focus again, the media will likely reengage.

 

[enquirer6]

For sure, but Summer Silly Season aside, there's absolutely nothing about the current stage of this investigation that would be likely to attract media attention anyway since it has nothing to do with MM.

She's the news generator, not CB.

When/if she seriously and concretely becomes the focus again, the media will likely reengage.

I think we can trust that John Clarke will have his finger on the pulse at Olive Press. He'll be the first to bring breaking news.

 

[C.greek]

I'm assuming he should be at least aware of the potential progress of the cases against him. Specified or not by the victims, "allowing" the examination could always bring him more risk and it will accumulate "physical" data that, could then be "easily" used against him. Or at least, be available and ready to be "processed".

He is definitely aware of the 5 new upcoming charges against him. His lawyer has been handed the cases files. He has known the specific details for a while now as he was making fun of how his teeth for example were presented... we have discussed this as well before here. These 5 cases have progressed quite a lot - and if we are to believe HCW - the rape case of HB, if CB is convicted, could well be the key for bringing the charge for MM.

Moreover, I don't think someone with psychopathic traits such as CB would be worried. On the contrary, He is excited about being the most "famous" German criminal (his words, not mine) .
Jmo

 

[RichardKimble]

He is definitely aware of the 5 new upcoming charges against him. His lawyer has been handed the cases files. He has known the specific details for a while now as he was making fun of how his teeth for example were presented... we have discussed this as well before here. These 5 cases have progressed quite a lot - and if we are to believe HCW - the rape case of HB, if CB is convicted, could well be the key for bringing the charge for MM.

Moreover, I don't think someone with psychopathic traits such as CB would be worried. On the contrary, He is excited about being the most "famous" German criminal (his words, not mine) .
Jmo

How could a conviction for a crime committed before Madeleine was at the very least a babe in arms be linked to the as yet unexplained disappearance ?

 

[Davieson]

How could a conviction for a crime committed before Madeleine was at the very least a babe in arms be linked to the as yet unexplained disappearance ?

I suppose it could be said to demonstrate an escalation of criminality, though I don't buy into that argument at all.
Police need hard evidence of CB's involvement with Madeleine and I'm not convinced they've got that.

 

[tedtink]

Obviously the German team doesn't let themselves get bogged down with the minute details of this investigation and they have the intellectual capacity and experience to look at the bigger picture which hasn't been distorted by their emotions or preconceived bias.
Some folk invested in this case understand that.

 

[Davieson]

Obviously the German team doesn't let themselves get bogged down with the minute details of this investigation and they have the intellectual capacity and experience to look at the bigger picture which hasn't been distorted by their emotions or preconceived bias.
Some folk invested in this case understand that.

You mean like demonstrating involvement in the McCann case ?

 

[RichardKimble]

Obviously the German team doesn't let themselves get bogged down with the minute details of this investigation and they have the intellectual capacity and experience to look at the bigger picture which hasn't been distorted by their emotions or preconceived bias.
Some folk invested in this case understand that.

The minute detail is was CB in Luz on the night of 3/05/2007 , seems as if what Wolters told MWT he can't place him there , until he gets past this little detail he's struggling imo.

 

[enquirer6]

How could a conviction for a crime committed before Madeleine was at the very least a babe in arms be linked to the as yet unexplained disappearance ?

It would be a link, strictly by association, that we can say, certainly, that should someone not Brueckner have been responsible for Madeleine's disappearance, Brueckner would have regarded that as a 'missed opportunity'.

In other words, Brueckner fits the profile of someone capable of a crime such as that Madeleine seems to have been a victim of.

Circumstantial and not, on its own, enough to convict, but in conjunction with other evidence ....

 

[tedtink]

The minute detail is was CB in Luz on the night of 3/05/2007 , seems as if what Wolters told MWT he can't place him there , until he gets past this little detail he's struggling imo.

If the weight of circumstantial evidence draws a reasonable inference that CB was in PDL, do you think HCW needs to ID the other caller to confirm?

 

[Davieson]

If the weight of circumstantial evidence draws a reasonable inference that CB was in PDL, do you think HCW needs to ID the other caller to confirm?

Maybe not, but he will need to demonstrate a clear link between CB and MM, particularly if he's aiming for a murder charge.

 

[C.greek]

Maybe not, but he will need to demonstrate a clear link between CB and MM, particularly if he's aiming for a murder charge.

I think the prosecutors must have considered this.

 

[Anxala]

I think we can trust that John Clarke will have his finger on the pulse at Olive Press. He'll be the first to bring breaking news.

No doubt.

And likely coming out from behind his pay-walled site to offer himself and his finger on the pulse breaking news up for tabloid grabs.

 

[Betty_Boop88]

I think the prosecutors must have considered this.

Perhaps HCW - a state prosecutor who has specialised in homicide cases for 20+ years and has recently been involved in securing a guilty verdict in a different no-body murder case - is unaware that he needs to demonstrate a clear link between CB and MM if he’s looking to prove murder? Should we get JC on it, to contact him and inform him ASAP just in case?

 

[C.greek]

Maybe not, but he will need to demonstrate a clear link between CB and MM, particularly if he's aiming for a murder charge.

I think the quotes I added above direct from HCW should be clear enough to explain the link between HB and the MM case. They show precedent and MO combined with other circumstantial evidence they have against CB. HCW has shown he can successfully do this with a no-body murder. Why do you think they are going for these 5 charges first?

The clear link between CB and the case of MM is opportunity (no alibi, proximity to the area, knowledge of the area , ping) motive (chats, convicted sex abuser of children and vulnerable people) and means (known burglar, the MO used in the other cases, or maybe even described in these said autobiographical books that CB had tried to destroy and/or in the chats and the witness statements which could all link back to the autobiographical books and witness statements- if CB had written/discussed/boasted about these other crimes for which he would be convicted then presumably what he said/wrote about MM would also be true and thus these cases could set a precedent for the inclusion and permissibility of this type of evidence for the case of MM .

Jmo

 

[Davieson]

I don't think that will be enough, but we'll need to wait for the trial, if there is one.

 

[RichardKimble]

I think the quotes I added above direct from HCW should be clear enough to explain the link between HB and the MM case. They show precedent and MO combined with other circumstantial evidence they have against CB. HCW has shown he can successfully do this with a no-body murder. Why do you think they are going for these 5 charges first?

The clear link between CB and the case of MM is opportunity (no alibi, proximity to the area, knowledge of the area , ping) motive (chats, convicted sex abuser of children and vulnerable people) and means (known burglar, the MO used in the other cases, or maybe even described in these said autobiographical books that CB had tried to destroy and/or in the chats and the witness statements which could all link back to the autobiographical books and witness statements- if CB had written/discussed/boasted about these other crimes for which he would be convicted then presumably what he said/wrote about MM would also be true and thus these cases could set a precedent for the inclusion and permissibility of this type of evidence for the case of MM .

Jmo

Yet not one piece of forensics , Wolter's : We cannot place CB in Luz on the night of 3/05/2007, we have no forensics into the death of Madeleine , how close is proximity, in the parish ? county ? a phone pings means nothing, OG established that with the three locals in 2014.

 

[RichardKimble]

I think the quotes I added above direct from HCW should be clear enough to explain the link between HB and the MM case. They show precedent and MO combined with other circumstantial evidence they have against CB. HCW has shown he can successfully do this with a no-body murder. Why do you think they are going for these 5 charges first?

The clear link between CB and the case of MM is opportunity (no alibi, proximity to the area, knowledge of the area , ping) motive (chats, convicted sex abuser of children and vulnerable people) and means (known burglar, the MO used in the other cases, or maybe even described in these said autobiographical books that CB had tried to destroy and/or in the chats and the witness statements which could all link back to the autobiographical books and witness statements- if CB had written/discussed/boasted about these other crimes for which he would be convicted then presumably what he said/wrote about MM would also be true and thus these cases could set a precedent for the inclusion and permissibility of this type of evidence for the case of MM .

Jmo

Awful lot of suspect bias with not a tangible piece to put to CB.

 

[C.greek]

Awful lot of suspect bias with not a tangible piece to put to CB.

Suspect bias? For a convicted child abuser and violent rapist? Who in his own words was a burglar and drug dealer?

Can you please pinpoint the bias?