Tekno
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2020
- Messages
- 416
- Reaction score
- 1,458
Please, let me know the geographical coordinates of the box factory.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please, let me know the geographical coordinates of the box factory.
Thank you. It’s a good find.On the MWT documentary , MWT visits the box factory and has part of the police report of the box factory raid where he says there are images of a 4 year old being sa in both the box factory and kiosk .
From 31.50
One was on a beach and the other in a playground. These was impulsive actions by CB.One thing in all of this there doesn't seem to be from what is known that CB filmed himself whilst abusing the two young girls he's charged (pending)with , yet the rapes he does, almost like he wants to watch them again.
Pixie, I’ve been meaning to respond to this, you make some good points.Yes. It would obviously be the smart thing to get rid of such evidence. And presumably, it wasn’t on the devices seized in 2013, when he assaulted NM.
But he might have already uploaded them which is where the Boys Town Administrators could assist.
When accessing CP, you need to provide your own original images so there’s that reason to keep your originals.
Then there’s the resale value and you might expect that anyone who purchased imagery from him should have received it.
It’s a shame he never met Panikspatz in person because he would have spilled so much to him in particular, as a consumer of young female CP.
It’s a weird response to native English speakers. It seems suspicious, as though he could deny it but he doesn’t want to… why?SF asked him if they found something belonging to M he then replied to SF‘s next response with the “I don’t want to deny it ”.
The press then guessed at fibres from her pyjamas which he denied.
It’s a weird response to native English speakers. It seems suspicious, as though he could deny it but he doesn’t want to… why?
Could of course just be how he is translating from German to English.
I think he is trying to say "neither confirm it nor deny it". But I do not speak German, babble English, and my mother tongue is Spanish.It’s a weird response to native English speakers. It seems suspicious, as though he could deny it but he doesn’t want to… why?
Could of course just be how he is translating from German to English.
My recent posts have been about getting to the bottom of the photo evidence which constantly reoccurs on the forum.Personally I think there is little value in trying to parse HCWs every word. Both because in other cases, statements have tended to be quite misleading about what they evidence, and I also doubt HCW is trying to give us clues.
And you are also correct about the language thing. We've seen before that some of the translations in the UK media are not particularly accurate, or where HCW speaks english, then we have to be careful.
Do you have the link to what he says in the SF interview? Did he say that in english or in german?
For instance "Ich will das nicht sagen" could have different Interpretations depending on context.
A
My recent posts have been about getting to the bottom of the photo evidence which constantly reoccurs on the forum.
I don’t think he has it and the more I look into it, the more I’m convinced. Others will believe what the believe.
He said the above comment in English, I’ll try to find the video and post it.
ETA: it’s not the full interview but scroll down to the second video and it’s about 50 seconds in.
I think he is trying to say "neither confirm it nor deny it". But I do not speak German, babble English, and my mother tongue is Spanish.
In that case, perhaps he'd be better not giving interviews to journalists and other media types.
Yes, you have been consistent on the photo.I've said since the start I don't think he has a photo.
Thanks. I remember this now.
He says I can't comment. Then she says "but you can't deny it" - so he answers using her construction. That's why it sounds awkward. IMO this comes down to the german use of "will" / "want". He's saying something more in the direction "I don't want to [comment]", not that he is unable to deny it. It has to be understood in context.
The idea this is some kind of special clue is far fetched IMO - prosecutors don't play 20 questions where they hint at what they have.
What is interesting is why SF is saying this, and whether she has a reliable source.
Posted this not long ago.May last year.SF asked him if they found something belonging to M he then replied to SF‘s next response with the “I don’t want to deny it ”.
The press then guessed at fibres from her pyjamas which he denied.
This from FF is makes the lack of physical evidence very clear:Posted this not long ago.May last year.
'We DO have new evidence… but we did NOT find fibres in Madeleine McCann suspect's van': German prosecutor DENIES bombshell claim but says new clue points to Christian Brueckner.
'I was asked if we had found evidence of something of Madeleine McCann in the suspect's van and I replied that I could not speak about the investigation, that's all.
We didn't find Madeleine McCann's clothes fibres, prosecutor says
Hans Christian Wolters, the German prosecutor investigating Maddie's disappearance, sparked rumours of a breakthrough find when he spoke of new evidence during a TV interview this week.www.dailymail.co.uk
I think born-again Sandra's desperately seeking assurance she hasn't been fooled twice. Like the rest of us she's sat there thinking why haven't you charged him already when you've told the world you're so confident?I've said since the start I don't think he has a photo.
Thanks. I remember this now.
He says I can't comment. Then she says "but you can't deny it" - so he answers using her construction. That's why it sounds awkward. IMO this comes down to the german use of "will" / "want". He's saying something more in the direction "I don't want to [comment]", not that he is unable to deny it. It has to be understood in context.
The idea this is some kind of special clue is far fetched IMO - prosecutors don't play 20 questions where they hint at what they have.
What is interesting is why SF is saying this, and whether she has a reliable source.
Of course he is But I wouldn't expect him to be giving ad hoc interviews to individual journalists , but to be giving out official statements on behalf of the department.I think that might be difficult for him if he is the designated spokesman for the Braunschweig prosecutors.
All throughout OG have always said they will not give a running commentary something Wolters ought bear in mind.Of course he is But I wouldn't expect him to be giving ad hoc interviews to individual journalists , but to be giving out official statements on behalf of the department.
Although a press conference would probably more appropriate than dropping confusing, sensationalised comments to SF, JC and MWT.All throughout OG have always said they will not give a running commentary something Wolters ought bear in mind.