They could have pictures of MM, in or nearby the campervan.
They could have pictures of MM nearby the campervan at a location they managed to identify as the Arade. And i don't think she is alive in the pictures. I cannot even fathom what they have tbh (judging from his chat with panikspatz)
One single objection!
If the police have sufficient evidence to prove that CB murdered MM - they don't need anything else. My opinion
I would prefer not to think of this. :-( better dead immediately poor baby
You're obviously not the only one, who is thinking this way.
Re " determined the method " , was that said at the same time he said " no one could have survived that " I wonder ?
You're obviously a prosecutor's dream jury member. But when you've been following a case this long, the truth matters!You're obviously not the only one, that is thinking this way.
Just imagine being a prosecutor from a small german town, being in charge, just because the little Mr. Sunshine called CB had his last official whereabout in that area.
Trying to do your job, whilst at least 50 % of the "fanboys" keep on critizising your efforts and to comfort a proven child molester and rapist who ran his mouth more than once about knowing what happened to the poor little child!
Maybe they found a distinctive blanket or rug, not bearing Madeleine's DNA, in the van which also features in a photograph or video showing Madeleine? The soil deposits could be on that item.
Great point, I didnt think of that. If the evidence from the van is weak, then evidence from Arade Reservior could be stronger, and even if it isnt it would surely strenghten the evidence found in his van. 2 peaces of weak(ish) evidence is better than one.
Sorry, where is that reported? no one could survived that? I've posted on this some pages behind but I cannot catch that in the press. I thought it could be my confusion.
The pollen could tie it to May. It could bolster a witness who saw him there or a satellite pic.
Also, pollen analysis looks at environmental and human interaction and exchange. Only my opinion and based on postgrad Archaeology.
What could they detect from pollen analysis?
Ha Tekno we might have crossed paths! It's not only pollen analysis but also microbes in the soil and other matter that pinpoints to blood, human interaction etc.
But imo the prosecution is giving the defence an easy out, it's in the public domain now CB is supposed to have visited the resevoir, all CBs team would need to do is confirm it, now what ? Now if remains were found that would be altogether different.You're obviously not the only one, who is thinking this way.
Just imagine being a prosecutor from a small german town, being in charge, just because the little Mr. Sunshine called CB had his last official whereabout in that area.
Trying to do your job, whilst at least 50 % of the "fanboys" keep on critizising your efforts and to comfort a proven child molester and rapist who ran his mouth more than once about knowing what happened to the poor little child!
All I know, Pixie, is that pollen is resistant to any element across time and space. Also, that it’s used in crime investigations as a reliable method.
There is a series of true life crimes on British tv called no1 suspect in a recent episode a DCI said they have to think like a defence lawyer whilst gathering evidence to make it water tight, never heard a defence team say they have to think like the investigators, so much easier if no defence was allowed one supposes.Or by so called "solicitors" who are usually making money by using every single loophole inside the law to defend their clients, but if prosecutors are doing the same, they tend to make up scandals out of it!
