JT told the world the child she saw being carried away wasn't screaming. So why is it suspicious when somebody says in 2008 the child didn't scream? Why would any police in UK or Portugal think someone repeating what JT said was suspicious?
Thank you for your response to my post and realising I was being serious, not mischievous.
JT did no such thing. She initially thought the child she saw being carried away was asleep. It was only when she heard that MM was missing she realised she might have witnessed her abduction.
So in effect and not for the first time there is a danger of JT being misrepresented for something said which was absolutely nonattributable to her.