LovelyPigeon
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2004
- Messages
- 13,806
- Reaction score
- 20
I'll vote we just stop discussing hats. Or at least, I'll stop discussing hats
Yes, great idea.Tricia said:What if we did have a private area for JB folks. That way if we want to discuss things that are not directly case related ( as in "hats") we can bring it to the private area and not bogg down the public forum and confuse people who are reading the forum but not posting.
I thought that is what the Jury Room/Parking Lot are for. If you want to say something to someone privately why not PM them? I think it will end up being just a place for posters to go and insult people and will ultimately cause trouble.Tricia said:My friends it seems like we are ganging up on LP. In my opinion we should put the "hat" matter to rest. We have our opinions and LP has hers. I don't think either side could change each others opinions.
I have been thinking. Scary I know but...What if we did have a private area for JB folks. That way if we want to discuss things that are not directly case related ( as in "hats") we can bring it to the private area and not bogg down the public forum and confuse people who are reading the forum but not posting.
Whaddya think?
Tricia
tipper said:I thought that is what the Jury Room/Parking Lot are for. If you want to say something to someone privately why not PM them? I think it will end up being just a place for posters to go and insult people and will ultimately cause trouble.
LovelyPigeon said:Misty, just to avoid any possible misunderstanding I'd like to point out that "dancing on JBR's grave fund to the tune of 40K." is not a quote of anything that LovelyPigeon ever wrote although I did leave jameson's forum because she sold interview materials to a tabloid for $40,000. That sale resulted in the National Enquirer's tabloid book "JonBenet (sic) The Police Files".
tipper said:I thought that is what the Jury Room/Parking Lot are for. If you want to say something to someone privately why not PM them? I think it will end up being just a place for posters to go and insult people and will ultimately cause trouble.
Spade said:This was posted at the Swamp in November 2003
Posted by SueSwamp: Lin made the tapes available to CBS and to Mills and Tracey - they took what they wanted for their programs. I made a copy of the tapes available to AMI - they paid to have it transcribed and they used whatever parts they wanted - - Lin and I didn't have any say in what they cut out......
This was posted by me at FFJ in November 2003
Michael Tracey is writing a column for the Rocky Mountain News on ethics in the media .proving once again that the Peter Principle (In a hierarchy, people tend to rise to their level of incompetence) is as valid today as it was 30 years ago.
This is the same Michael Tracey who produced two pro-Ramsey infomercials that he has profited from and now it looks to me that he has been able to suck at least another $20,000 out of JonBenets corpse. This puts him right at the banquet table with LinWad (who claims he has made more money from the Ramsey case than Darnay has made in his life), Charlie Brennan (who collected $500/week for 2 years from both the Globe and the Star PLUS $$$$ from Schiller PLUS his salary from the Rocky Mountain News), and of course Sue Bennett who received $40,000 for the interview tapes BUT I will bet that she didnt keep the all the tab cash. IMO it is very likely that she split it with fellow bottom-feeder Michael Tracey. If true, the irony of this is over-whelming. It means that Tracey took the tabs money to produce an anti-tab TV show. Isnt he the perfect guy to be writing a column on ethics?
LovelyPigeon said:Misty, just to avoid any possible misunderstanding I'd like to point out that "dancing on JBR's grave fund to the tune of 40K." is not a quote of anything that LovelyPigeon ever wrote although I did leave jameson's forum because she sold interview materials to a tabloid for $40,000. That sale resulted in the National Enquirer's tabloid book "JonBenet (sic) The Police Files".
Wrangler said:I don't see where any of the dual posters (WS & WB) have objected to Jams private and hidden section of her forum where posters are discussed and insulted. Why is that?