Quote:
Flight MH370 sent signals to a satellite for four hours after the aircraft went missing, the Associated Press quotes an unnamed US official as saying:
The official said the Boeing 777-200 wasnt transmitting data to the satellite, but sending out a signal to establish contact. Boeing offers a satellite service that can receive a stream of data during flight on how the aircraft is functioning.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasnt authorized to speak publicly, said Malaysia Airlines didnt subscribe to that service, but the system was automatically pinging the satellite anyway.
The official also said some messages involving a different data service were received for a short time after the planes transponder went silent.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/bl...is-detected-by-chinese-satellite-live-updates
Does anybody know when the next scheduled presser is? They have generally been scheduled for 1700 local time (0500 EST) but I know there have been frequent deviations (sometimes pushing up the time, but usually pushing it back).
:seeya: ilovepierre, there are not many reasons why one be turned off.
Even it is turned off or faulty, why isn't there a back-up system?
Why is transponder made available to the pilot to turn on or off?
Why,/when would a pilot want to turn it off?
Sri Jegarajah ‏@cnbcSri 1h
@CNBC cameraman Lye Kwai Chuen sets up for the next #MH370 press briefing pic.twitter.com/QdTtwHP3vY
https://twitter.com/cnbcSri
Only found this.
I want to help you out but I haven't learned much today either. What is being said now is that the transponders were turned off at different times leading most people to believe it was intentional and CNN is running a banner that says there is a significant likelihood the plane is at the bottom of the Indian Ocean. I wish I could be more help.Can someone please give me update. I have been at work all day... And haven't been able to follow along.
Do we know for sure it actually kept flying for hours? Or is that just rumor at this point? I agree there is almost no way the pilot just drove around for hours before committing suicide. That would be incredibly odd and pointless, as would turning off the transponder - unless the theory is that he didn't want anyone to know it was a suicide so he didn't want it to be found. It seems quite unlikely to me, but so do all the other scenarios.
Can someone please give me update. I have been at work all day... And haven't been able to follow along.
You're not thinking like a terrorist. Planes are expensive - why waste one of your own when you can steal someone else's? Perhaps part of the thrill is the risk. Failing is just taking one for the cause, there's always another terrorist ready to step up and take your place. I think whoever hijacked this plane (assuming) is planning to make a statement, a much bigger one than simply hijacking a plane. This was not a whim, it was a very well researched and well executed plan, IMO, and it hasn't reached stage 2 yet.
People would have thought 9/11 was impossible yet it happened.[/QU
I so agree and its scary.................
There is a back-up. The planes are equipped with two transmitters. If one fails, the other can be switched on.
I wonder if they a sleeping gas?I don't think that would explain both going off with such a separation of time, but I really don't know. It is an idea for sure.