EuTuCroquet?
“What's happening to my special purpose!?”
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2017
- Messages
- 5,402
- Reaction score
- 8,716
Just jumping off the post below. I'm at a loss at to what's so confusing to so many folks about the skewed power dynamic when it comes to sex in the workplace. Experts have shared clear-cut definitions; many were in links posted to this thread.
This statement below (from the linked article upthread) exactly illustrates one clear reason why Matt Lauer was fired — with cause — from his job.
From the link: "Although Zinone’s situation was consensual, she saw parallels between her own story and several accounts from the unnamed victims. Her situation is different than other allegations against Lauer, which involved unwanted advances. But it illustrates what can happen when a prominent person brings sex into the workplace, and there’s an imbalance of power. For Zinone, Lauer’s behavior had a devastating and lasting effect on her personal and professional life."
This statement below (from the linked article upthread) exactly illustrates one clear reason why Matt Lauer was fired — with cause — from his job.
From the link: "Although Zinone’s situation was consensual, she saw parallels between her own story and several accounts from the unnamed victims. Her situation is different than other allegations against Lauer, which involved unwanted advances. But it illustrates what can happen when a prominent person brings sex into the workplace, and there’s an imbalance of power. For Zinone, Lauer’s behavior had a devastating and lasting effect on her personal and professional life."
I'm not seeing a victim here. I see a consensual "encounter".