The Christian Science Monitor online has an interesting article today on how knife laws disproportionately affect minorities. It notes the "good faith" standard the SC set long ago that a police officer, even if it turns out later s/he was wrong (for instance, about the illegality of a FG's knife), s/he should not be held criminally liable (or the case tossed out) later on for being mistaken. Then came this about a SC ruling in December:
"In Heien v. North Carolina, the Supreme Court ruled in December that US cops are allowed to make such reasonable mistakes of the law. A motorist was mistakenly pulled over for having one brake light out, even though that was legal under state law. A search of the car found cocaine. The motorist claimed police had no reason to pull him over. The Supreme Court sided with the officer. The question here is whether reasonable suspicion can rest on a mistaken understanding of the scope of a legal prohibition, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in the 8-to-1 decision. We hold that it can.