Whomever the LA dude is, there was only TRACE amounts of his DNA found on Rachel's body. You can go google, or bing, etc, or run down to the nearest criminology library to determine what 'trace' amounts means, etc, and you're going to notice that what happened to Rachel was probably not a SA, and probably not a violent murder situation by the person whose 'trace' DNA was found on her body. So, even though LA dude is suspect, he's not going to be the one getting arrested that's for sure.The video is bad but the number of guys who are about 5"9", 160, no visible tatoos, were in LA in March, not in LA in August, etc. is limited. problem is he may not have close associates OR his close associates if he has them, may know him as a "nice guy" who would not do such things... ala Abby and Libby's accused killer and Molly Tibbett's murderer who had a daughter himself![]()
So go ask yourselves where could this 'trace' DNA come from, and how trace amounts ended up on her body, etc, etc .... keep in mind that it's been plastered all over the media that Rachel was on 'MULTIPLE' dating sites, that she was a gym member, spray tan enthusiast, had a cleaning business, etc, etc, etc, so many sources of where this 'trace' amount of DNA could've been picked up.
![1693540275483.png 1693540275483.png](https://www.websleuths.com/forums/data/attachments/416/416985-d5559fc7ff1cdda356d0cd1c0633e089.jpg)