I don’t feel very wise with this- just completely perplexed with the devotion to vitriol in media. That it gets so many clicks & makes so much $$$$$ is a really sad testament to society. MoVery wise words JudgeJoe. Very wise words
I don’t feel very wise with this- just completely perplexed with the devotion to vitriol in media. That it gets so many clicks & makes so much $$$$$ is a really sad testament to society. MoVery wise words JudgeJoe. Very wise words
I guess from now on every letter & post card one writes needs to have that little “c” in the circle with your name, the date & the words “may not be reprinted without express written permission”. Good grief. These media ppl need to just <modsnip>. Mo. This isn’t about H&M...
The thing is no communication is safe. M's dad was hurt to see what her "friends" were saying. M made a mistake by writing a letter given the circumstances. M has not been honest herself either and that's why the media has been writing articles about her. DC has been thrown in the media pool but she has no episodes of being untruthful. Media has the right to report and M wasnt ready for them. Not fair of her to throw DC into her drama either. A longer courtship would have been more ideal for all parties but it was all rush rush. MOOI guess from now on every letter & post card one writes needs to have that little “c” in the circle with your name, the date & the words “may not be reprinted without express written permission”. Good grief. These media ppl need to just F off. Mo. This isn’t about H&M...
I don’t feel very wise with this- just completely perplexed with the devotion to vitriol in media. That it gets so many clicks & makes so much $$$$$ is a really sad testament to society. Mo
Respectfully, that’s a lot of conclusions drawn over public figures- who do have rights to privacy. And are constantly exploited from sources that have little validity imo.The thing is no communication is safe. M's dad was hurt to see what her "friends" were saying. M made a mistake by writing a letter given the circumstances. M has not been honest herself either and that's why the media has been writing articles about her. DC has been thrown in the media pool but she has no episodes of being untruthful. Media has the right to report and M wasnt ready for them. Not fair of her to throw DC into her drama either. A longer courtship would have been more ideal for all parties but it was all rush rush. MOO
Meghan Markle lawyers "surprised" by court decision in Mail on Sunday case
From the article:
A spokesperson for Schillings, the duchess' lawyers, stressed that the main parts of her case relating to privacy and copyright "do not change and will continue to move forward.”
Their statement said: "Whilst the judge recognizes that there is a claim for breach of privacy and copyright, we are surprised to see that his ruling suggests that dishonest behaviour is not relevant.”
"We feel honesty and integrity are at the core of what matters; or as it relates to the Mail on Sunday and Associated Newspapers [the publisher], their lack thereof.
I think this is about correcting a narrative rather than privacy. Because that holds no weight anymore
A celebrity knows that they will not have the privacy ‘they want’ at the onset.
Her actions don’t warrant privacy by her own admission. She made it public when she chose to speak about the RF in the documentary. Followed up by a public announcement in stepping down. Both of which were a surprise and shocking.
How can she escape the fallout that she started?! If this were done privately there would be more chance of her biological family stuff eventually subsiding.
A celebrity knows that they will not have the privacy ‘they want’ at the onset.
Her actions don’t warrant privacy by her own admission. She made it public when she chose to speak about the RF in the documentary. Followed up by a public announcement in stepping down. Both of which were a surprise and shocking.
How can she escape the fallout that she started?! If this were done privately there would be more chance of her biological family stuff eventually subsiding.
Meghan Markle: Multiple claims dismissed in Mail on Sunday case | Daily Mail Online
This is a like a train ploughing into a petrol tanker. A complete disaster': Legal experts say judge's decision to dismiss major parts of Meghan Markle's letter case against Mail on Sunday is a 'humiliation'
Meghan Markle lawyers "surprised" by court decision in Mail on Sunday case
From the article:
A spokesperson for Schillings, the duchess' lawyers, stressed that the main parts of her case relating to privacy and copyright "do not change and will continue to move forward.”
Their statement said: "Whilst the judge recognizes that there is a claim for breach of privacy and copyright, we are surprised to see that his ruling suggests that dishonest behaviour is not relevant.”
"We feel honesty and integrity are at the core of what matters; or as it relates to the Mail on Sunday and Associated Newspapers [the publisher], their lack thereof.
If you’re asking me- idk that answer. I’m looking forward to the actual facts to be sorted out in court rather than the British tabloid rags. I’m really sick of the total lack of integrity in reporting today across all topics- and I’m sure this one is no exception.It seems to come down to the question of whether Markle breached her own privacy by spreading rumour about the letter with up to 5 friends, that was published, so her father released the actual letter as rebuttal. Was that reasonable in order to protect his reputation?
It seems to come down to the question of whether Markle breached her own privacy by spreading rumour about the letter with up to 5 friends, that was published, so her father released the actual letter as rebuttal. Was that reasonable in order to protect his reputation?
It is reasonable to assume, a person has a right to defend themselves. Isn't that what MM is trying to do, justifying the way she treats her father? Why should her father be an exception? He doesn't have lots of rich, media connected friends that can "leak" stories to the press.
Harry never even met her father is person, that to me says a lot about how Thomas Markle was treated by MM and Harry.
MMO
It is reasonable to assume, a person has a right to defend themselves. Isn't that what MM is trying to do, justifying the way she treats her father? Why should her father be an exception? He doesn't have lots of rich, media connected friends that can "leak" stories to the press.
Harry never even met her father is person, that to me says a lot about how Thomas Markle was treated by MM and Harry.
MMO