Male:
1. ) Has a close relationship with one or more of the Ramsey's directly (of those who live in any capacity at the Ramsey's home) or indirectly (of any Ramsey connection via family or friends or workers, etc). The relationship must be one that enables this male to know the family dynamics, the layout of the home, an access to the home, is aware of or knows the dog's living situation (stays at neighbors). One important point: This male must know John Andrew Ramsey and may even be a "mentor" (or was one at one time during his life (and may even be the same age as John Andrew (or close to it)). This male has a protective sense about John Andrew Ramsey. (For those who do not know, JAR (John Andrew Ramsey) is Jonbenet's older 1/2 brother from John Ramsey's first marriage.
2.) Political Science educated (or student). This male has studied (in part, or majored in) Political Science.
3.) This male may have been in Great Britain, or has some connection, relative, or interest in Great Britain.
4.). This male (from a 90's perspective) was familiar or affected by Bosnia news at that time and may have some Liberian (at that time) 'payback rage' due to reading or studying or hearing (via news) the events at that time frame (90's).
5.) This male is familiar with fishing/hunting practices and field dressing and has done so. Someone close to him hunts (if he does not regularly), but he has access to their hunting/fishing gear (supplies). (Duct tape, nylon flat cord, knives, gloves, etc.). ​
Scroll down to see different survival belts and kits for various years, including the 90's:
http://committee.org/TUP/david_lee.htm
6.) This male has access to a canoe or small boat (which may be used in water mammal hunting as well as fishing).
7.) This male (or someone close to him) is a member of the Boulder Horseshoe Club (the sport is not equestrian it is throwing 2.5 pounds (weight) metal horseshoe shapes a determined distance to "ring" around a metal pole stationed a determined distance). The horseshoe shape is distinctive as seen in this photo (for example).
This is pure fantasy. You are in the Lou Smit school of thought..... create an intruder out of thin air and give him whichever character traits, interests, etc. that suit whichever direction you are going with it.
Interest in Bosnia?!? May have visited Britain?!? A hunter?
The possibilities are literally endless. Maybe he visited Arizona, was interested in Canada, and instead of hunting he collected postage stamps as a hobby.
This is one of the reasons this stuff is shunned now.
You also do what IDI always loved to do....
You ignore the personal nature of the crime by simply stating this phantom intruder knew the family somehow and/or monitored them but this is disingenuous..... it still doesn't explain the personal nature of the crime....and you know it. IDI always hoped people would ignore these pesky facts.
No one in 2017 is going to ignore it.
IDI does not work anymore whether discussion is banned or not. The only people it will work on are those who know nothing about the case. Hell, even those previously high up on the IDI food chain never believed it at all. They had ulterior motives for pushing it.
This theory excludes Patsy, John, and Burke Ramsey as having any involvement (direct) in the murder of Jonbenet Ramsey.
How convenient!
There is at least two people who planned this "kidnapping". One is male, the other is female (who has an extremely close relation to the male--either girlfriend, sister, close friend, relative, etc.)
There's less than zero evidence to indicate this.
Another problem for IDI. It cant follow the evidence because the evidence takes them to RDI. They know it....which is why they ignore it.
You would've loved all the Ramsey sites many years ago when it was carte blanche and IDI had a specific agenda.
Its just not feasible anymore(it really never was) and while not a big fan of anything resembling censorship, I'm glad WS pulled the plug on this stuff.
Yes. No different, no better, no worse than any other IDI scenario.
What if there is a proof something was stolen from their house?
You've got a really big problem with this....in 20 years and counting, there's less than zero evidence of this and even if there was a hint of truth to it, the Ramseys, Lou Smit, and Jameson would've been instantly screaming it from the highest mountaintop. They didn't.....because nothing was stolen from the house. period.
Its desperation to add elements of fantasy into unrealistic IDI scenarios and like I already said, it doesn't work anymore.
