So then, does Meredith deserve any less justice because she was the roommate rather than the daughter? What makes it okay to party after you've just been involved in a murder. The guy who killed Daniel Horowitz's wife also went right after and had sex. (Not trying to bait you, that's just what I'm getting from your post...)
Absolutely not. You stated that she acted just like casey. I disagree. Apathy, having sex, doing cartwheels and buying lingerie in a case where one's roommate has been murdered is off to me but in no way implicates a person to the same degree as it would if the victim was a beloved relation, especially one's child.
Knox was a 20 year old girl who didn't love her roommate. They just roomed together. So her apathy, while bizarre, is not at all as troubling to me as the apathy shown by the mother of a child who had died or been kidnapped. So while it sparks red flags to me in the case of a 20 year old reacting to a roommate's murder, it is not simply not enough and can be explained away as the antics of an immature girl who doesn't understand tragedy or doesn't much care.
When it's someone's mom acting like that though, I don't need much more to believe the person is guilty. One is bizarre and off the other is diabolically abhorrent.
I still have never had a satisfactory explanation as to why three unrelated people, two of whom literally just met and neither having nay psychiatric or criminal backgrounds, and one of whom no connection to the other two was ever proved, would brutally rape and murder an innocent girl together.
In casey's case, the reason was clear to me. In this case, it makes no sense and the three doing this together defies reason. If it had been Knox implicated alone, I would have felt it much more plausible. But three? Under those conditions? Not knowing each other or having just met? :twocents: