Thanks Anthony. My ex husband said I was a great detective. That's why he's my ex.
Ha! My husband says the same. Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks Anthony. My ex husband said I was a great detective. That's why he's my ex.
I really liked your comment about someone looking like FG. Suppose in his security position his job function took him out on the lot. Anyone from afar could easily mistake someone of a similar appearance, especially since they are used to seeing him outside. And I believe there have been searches in different cases where police go twice to the same home and nothing turns up. Im not so quick to point a finger at him.
Thanks Anthony. My ex husband said I was a great detective. That's why he's my ex.
Where at MetLife would they have gotten video from? And I wonder why anyone working there presently or in the past would confront her there or want to be seen with her there knowing there are cameras around. If they were up to something that is. I am not sure an arrest is imminent. Hoping this doesn't fade away into another cold case and 20 years down the road we are still wondering. There are so many of those in every state.
It was already stated and shown by a poster here that generously did a go pro drive of DS work to home to Berkeley house ...go check thread 5, I believe that's where it was. It shows the signs, he discussed the cameras etc
Btw crime of passion never cares about cameras...if he got p.o.'d enough and shoved her in the car etc he wasn't thinking about cameras
Thanks Anthony. My ex husband said I was a great detective. That's why he's my ex.
Agree.
Now FG and Danielles friends are in the realm of whatever.
But why would her job and apt complex both offer 50k a piece for safe return?
Just asking.
Now I understand MetLife for doing a PR move to protect the image.
But as far as the IG management complex.
Why?
Thanks Anthony. My ex husband said I was a great detective. That's why he's my ex.
Wondering if someone was in her vehicle and had another person follow from behind.Similar question asked a few threads ago. I answered then and now: It's the right thing to do in the event that Danielle was abducted from IGA property (or that another crime was committed on said property - in her apartment, vestibule of her building, at the mailboxes, parking lot, etc.).
The last time I offered this response, I was convinced that something must have happened at IGA since Danielle's car was found there. I'm now leaning towards the abduction and/or crime taking place at or near MetLife or along the route to Danielle's apartment at IGA.
Good points! In addition, they only get money if she is found safe and they prosecute someone.I've always wondered something about this "reward money thing". Honestly I don't get it. How could someone realistically provide information of enough quality to get them a big sum of reward money, without having committed a crime somewhere along the line? Lets say someone witnessed an abduction and kept their most shut for 3 days, then sees the big reward and spills the beans. IF something happened to Danielle while that person was busy NOT calling police, aren't they guilty of something? Like Aiding and abetting or something?
Even if someone was just told what happened, and sat on it for any period of time, I'm pretty sure thats a crime. What I'm wondering is in what scenario someone could realistically
1) Know the truth
and
2) Not be guilty of something.
Furthermore, if #1 and #2 aren't possible, why would anyone come forward with information. This always bothers me about these "reward" scenarios.
Since you like my thinking let me point one more thing out to you Tiffran. Typically she slept at this friends house every weekend. But on that Friday she called the friend late in the day to tell her she would spend the night. Then asked to leave early. It could be she had originally had something preempting her from sleeping at the friends. Then something happened. whatever she was suppose to do was canceled. And she was upset. Real upset. So she calls the friend, and wants to get the hell out of work. But when she gets to the car, something bad related to all this happens... The person most likely to know some details, her friend.. And based on the information she could provide and cameras, the apartment is no longer an interest to rescuers.
I was reading the fds Facebook page just now and wondering the same. I'm not sure they actually know. But, if they do, and they are still trying to build a solid, airtight case, they may stay quiet? On the other hand, it would surely be helpful to know when asking the public to report if they saw her or the jeep during that critical period. Having another person to have possibly seen could be helpful... so, I'm really not convinced they know.Why would LE not mention the person she was last seen with if they knew?
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk