Steely Dan
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 30,558
- Reaction score
- 107
I didn't see it i the first article either. It's in the bottom one gainesville something news.
Thank you you've been a great help. :crazy:
I didn't see it i the first article either. It's in the bottom one gainesville something news.
I didn't see it in the first article either. It's in the bottom one gainesville something news.
It's in post 193 above. photo of rose in bottom article. (Could be just a photo of a rose in woods from the paper? Or is this the actual rose?)
What do you think about the story she told of the gun being stolen and she found it in a ditch? Why would someone steal a gun then throw it away? Was it used? Wish it could have been fingerprinted. Is her story even true?
im beginning to wonder if she was trippin .. i am serious acid or something and saw what happened but thinks its a dream ? i dunno .. something weird is goin on she needs to have her hair sampled for drugs LOLI did not catch this before! So, now when she fails the test, maybe she did see people there? Why would she never have shared this tidbit of info with LE??? "I might have been dreaming, but I might have seen some people in my house that night" - is that really not important? Come on.
I haven't followed this case very closely, but regarding this LDT I think its open to interpretation. If MC really knows who took Haleigh then why was her answer to this specific question more accurate than inaccurate per the test?
Ie: why doesnt the result to' Do you know who took Haleigh?' show as much deception as the other questions?
Heres a possible interpretation FWIW:
Question: Did you intentionally withhold any information regarding Haleigh's disappearance?
Answer: No
Result: 99% deception (possibly cleared the house of drug paraphenalia prior to LE arrival and intentionally held back this info to protect herself and RC at the time of haleighs disappearance)
Question: Do you know what happened to Haleigh?
Answer: No
Result: 99% deception ( she has ideas as to what happened to Haleigh and offers up possible suspects, so she thinks she knows, but doesnt know for certain)
Question: Do you know where Haleigh is now?
Answer: No
Result: 95% Deception (again, she may have ideas or thoughts like many of us do as to haleighs wherabouts, but she doesnt know for certain)
Question: Do you know who took Haleigh?
Answer: No
Result: 42% deception
I wonder if any of us took the same test, what our results would be since some have developed theories as to what happened in this case. Would those results show that we know (think) what happened to this little girl, and if we answered no because we don't know for certain, if it would come up as a deceptive repsonse, just because we think we know?(lol....thats kinda hard to follow).:waitasec:
Basically what it comes down to is theres a pretty fine line between thinking and knowing something, and can a basic test like this really determine the difference?
Also, from the video it appears that there were no baseline questions done- they just jumped straight into questioning, and IIRC there where other people in the room at the time. This is very different to any other LDT I have seen before.(other than reality shows)
The sad thing about this case are there are just so many shady characters, and family alliances that make it so difficult to know who could be responsible.
JMO
What would they arrest her for? What charge?
Making a false statement to the police?
You can't use the lie detector as evidence of that, and you can't physically prove she is lying because no one knows what actually happened.
You can't charge her with harming her, there is no proof of that.
You can't charge her with neglect, she notified the police supposedly in short order.
Their hands are pretty tied at the moment.
The fact that none of the family, especially Ron, is reacting to this news tells you that none of this is a revelation to the families.
The only part that surprises is me is that this far in she still thinks she can outsmart a polygraph.
im beginning to wonder if she was trippin .. i am serious acid or something and saw what happened but thinks its a dream ? i dunno .. something weird is goin on she needs to have her hair sampled for drugs LOL
I can't remember, was the stolen gun event before or after Haleigh went missing?
Someone could
*hide a gun to avoid being threatened or shot by it
*hide a gun that was used in the commission of a crime (didn't do a very good job in this case)
*pretend a gun had been stolen in order to implicate someone else in a crime, then pretend to find it
*actually steal a gun then hide it close by for later use but leave town without retrieving it.
That's all I can think of.
Thanks Theonly1
My impression is that drugs play a role in this somehow, but unlikely LSD/trip/acid since she would still have been completely out of it when LE arrived. Thats something you can't just snap out of, no matter how hard you try. Something shorter lasting is more likely. . Pot would not have that much of an impact imo, especially if she was a regular user.
Do we know what drugs she used on the 3 day bender?
It seems weird that if she went back to bed with RC after dropping haleigh off at school, until the afternoon, that she would be able to sleep again at 10pm-ish....unless she was coming down or still consuming downers.
RC says that when he arrived home at 3am-ish the beds were made- does he specify that he saw their bed made up after they both woke the afternoon before, when he was leaving for work? Or did she make the beds after he left?
The 'pee on the blanket' issue bothers me. Too much detail on that one point.
Either its part of the story behind what happened that night, or maybe someone (RC) has told her she's a bad step-mom if she lets the kids sleep in stinky blankets, and thats why she puts so much focus on it.'(See I can do things right , and am capable even though I'm still a kid myself').
The arrested KC for child neglect and child endangerment in addition to the lying. Seems to me the babysitter would have had to neglect Haleigh in order to lose her. In neglecting her, she endangered her.
I say arrest her. She'll crack in about 34hours IMO.
Thanks Theonly1
What are they measuring. Voice? Heart rate, breathing??? I don't understand. She isn't hooked up to anything I can even see. She uses her hands at several times and nothing.
A few thoughts came to mind watching this. Before I can judge what percentage she's being deceitful in her answers to a few questions. What was her honesty/deceit score on the thousand of other questions she was asked. Where these the only questions she failed?
If she came to me and told me that story, making eye contact and crying actual liquid tears, I'd tend to believe her and do.
butwhatif?, good points! I do think washing the blanket/sheet and the blanket in the van, has a meaning in this case.
I agree, sleeping til the afternoon with R, I can't see her getting sleepy til after midnight.
I have to somewhat disagree with the point about tripping on LSD.
I agree she would still have not been completely out of the trip when LE arrived. IMO, that would not mean she could not have talked to LE and anyone else. I witnessed several friends doing acid in the '70's, at music festivals, and they certainly were able to talk.
I suspect she was given the 'date rape' drug by someone visiting her that evening. That would be the reason she was in a fog and didn't wake up when Jr. got out of bed, if this story is true. I had thought Jr. got out of bed because he heard someone in the trailer or knocking on the door.
Of course now we hear the bed wasn't slept in, so that would make that story just a story.
One can only guess where the kids or M was that night.... sleeping in the van seems a possibility....my head is spinning with possibilities.
People lose kids without be neglectful.
She does not meet the standard for child neglect or endangerment based on the facts we can see at this point.
Arresting her too soon can end up with all the evidence they have collected up until that point being thrown out or the charges being dropped.
She was apparently out of the house on a 3 day bender of booze and drugs days before Hayleigh went missing.
I don't think anyone would have to slip her anything. They would just have to show up with party materials when Ron isn't around, or even when he is given his history with the law.
Sorry I know how much everyone feels for him but it is so patently obvious that drugs played a huge role in that household.
Just based on her appearence and demeanor in some of the early interview, I am going to hazzard a guess that inappropriate use of Oxycontin, barbituates or some similar depresent is part of her normal repetoire.
She has those sort of dead looking unfocused eyes that are pretty indicative of those sorts of meds.
And I am going to hazard a guess that noone slipped her a date rape drug to go do TV interviews. The girl looks to me like a heavy heavy pill popper.
faefrost; Good points!
I didn't know how those drugs affected a person. I agree about the eyes, also.
I think it could be a possibility, the child died from getting into R & M's drugs.
Seems a case could be made, in several ways, on R. for child endangerment....
im beginning to wonder if she was trippin .. i am serious acid or something and saw what happened but thinks its a dream ? i dunno .. something weird is goin on she needs to have her hair sampled for drugs LOL
Gracenote, What IF, R did get in a fight just as M. said?
Here's one of my theories,
R. discovers his gun missing while the cousin is visiting. He tries to take the gun away from the guy before he leaves their yard, while wrestling over the gun it goes off and shoots the child.
They panic and throw it in a ditch.