I think the jury got it right
I agree. I think he had every right to defend himself and his home, but he took it beyond self-defense.
I think the jury got it right
I agree. I think he had every right to defend himself and his home, but he took it beyond self-defense.
Thank the Founders and G-d for appeals.
He should called the police right after he shot them and then lawyered up. Then he could have lied about what actually happened. "I shot them and they were still moving and I thought they were going for a gun so I shot them again. I was afraid for my life." The evidence would have shown his home was broken into by these 2, who had broken into his home and the homes of others before. Clearly by his actions after he shot them ie. waiting until the next day to report it (who leaves 2 dead bodies in their house overnight???) and by the statements he made, he's unstable.
I have to wonder why he made the audiotape. He never told the police about it. The investigators found it. I think he made an audiotaped souvenir so he could could play it over and over again. There was no other reason to make it as it proved the case against him.
IMO, first or second degree murder is ridiculous. This man was in his own home ... What gives these 2 the right to break in repeatedly?! And he's supposed to just sit back and take it?? Maybe, if the police had done their job to begin with, the two thieves would have been in jail, and not dead. I think he was pushed to a breaking point, and at the end of the day, he didn't go confront them .. They BROKE IN his house yet again!!
IMO, first or second degree murder is ridiculous. This man was in his own home ... What gives these 2 the right to break in repeatedly?! And he's supposed to just sit back and take it?? Maybe, if the police had done their job to begin with, the two thieves would have been in jail, and not dead. I think he was pushed to a breaking point, and at the end of the day, he didn't go confront them .. They BROKE IN his house yet again!!
(SNIP)
I just hope that this guilty verdict doesn't send the wrong message to burglars causing them to believe that homeowners will be less likely to protect their homes if they know that they will be convicted of first degree murder.
(SNIP)
I feel like he snapped. He does NOT deserve life in prison. He is not a danger to society any more than I am. Break in my house and I will shoot you too, more than once and not just to get your attention.
He has my complete sympathy.
I'm seeing a lot of this carte blanche reasoning to do whatever one wants to do to an intruder in their home. So where does the line get drawn?
He had been kind to them and they returned the favor by stealing from him and targeting for vandalism and break ins.