Tippy Lynn
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2016
- Messages
- 7,302
- Reaction score
- 53,080
This cardiologist testified he sees no evidence that Fentanyl cause GF's death.
not sure why but his testimony seems off to me.I am doubtful that Nelson has the capability and knowledge to successfully cross this witness. But man, I can imagine some Cardiologists and others doing an extreme wt* at his testimony. It's alarming to me.
I think most would agree with that statement.Preventable death
This cardiologist testified he sees no evidence that Fentanyl cause GF's death.
yes remember the one that said most smokers never have heart issues etc.Personally, I was under the impression that high blood pressure and carotid disease were not indicators of a “strong heart,” and wasn’t aware that clogged hearts “make you stronger” in a positive manner. 75% - 90% clogged arteries? No big deal.
A previous witness already mentioned smoking isn’t all that unhealthy. My concern is: have I been bamboozled by American healthcare industry until this trial?
I think it depends on the situation and whether or not they are actually overdosing. Once a person passes out or is having trouble breathing during a overdose, the only thing that will reverse the effects is Naloxone. They can't just "snap back" from an overdose, imo.he also said his heart was good.
I have a question.. not for you Tippy, but for anyone that might know...
Fenatanyl causes lethargy, meth causes the opposite.
If someone had taken a lethal dose of fentanyl, and before they passed out, took meth... what would happen?
It was brought up this morning again that GF was nodding off in the car before LE got there, and I think of that when they say fentanyl or fetanyl overdose causes this type of behaviour.
I agree; I worked in cardiology, and IMO, this doctor is absolutely correct. If GF had had even a "mild" heart attack, there would definitely be scar tissue in the heart muscle.I'm not hearing anything from Dr. Rich that I'd class as 'contradictory' to previous expert witnesses' testimony. Rather, what I'm better understanding from this testimony is that, in spite of the narrowing of the arteries, and mild enlargement of the heart muscle, there is no indication of GF having experienced any cardiac incident or heart attack. If he'd ever had such an incident, it would be evident by scar tissue in the endocardium tissue, and there would have been platelets and other signs found within the arteries. None were found. This certainly answers some questions for me.
I thought he said only 10 percent develop lung disease.yes remember the one that said most smokers never have heart issues etc.
absolutely he did NOT have a heart attack...however I think he had some conditions as documented by autopsy that could be argued contributed to but not caused the death.I agree; I worked in cardiology, and IMO, this doctor is absolutely correct. If GF had had even a "mild" heart attack, there would definitely be scar tissue in the heart muscle.
I agree; I worked in cardiology, and IMO, this doctor is absolutely correct. If GF had had even a "mild" heart attack, there would definitely be scar tissue in the heart muscle.