dixiegirl1035
I will do it, but I won't like it
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2017
- Messages
- 12,887
- Reaction score
- 99,747
I dont think he will say anything during sentencing. It might jeopardise his appeal.
Excellent point, well taken.
I dont think he will say anything during sentencing. It might jeopardise his appeal.
can he do that and still appeal?But nevertheless he should overcome his weakness and stand tall, take off his mask, apologize and try to explain his behaviour. Like a man and an officer with honour.
I meant the trial. It was the time to talk and explain - he pled innocence so why not fight for his goood name and reputation? During sentencing it will be "mustard after dinner" haha Besides it is not a good idea if he thinks about appeal. I should have written: He should have... English is not my mother tongue, I live on other continent in a far away countrycan he do that and still appeal?
I meant the trial. It was the time to talk and explain - he pled innocence so why not fight for his goood name and reputation? During sentencing it will be "mustard after dinner" haha Besides it is not a good idea if he thinks about appeal. I should have written: He should have... English is not my mother tongue, I live on other continent in a far away country
I know! I even visited your beautiful country, Riga to be precise with Comenius Exchange from school. WOW what hospitality I learnt to dance Latvian folk dances but nearly fainted after finishing. You, Latvian people are VERY energetic hahaYou are not too far away from me!
He wouldn't be able to explain it because he knows what he did was wrong. That's why he wanted a plea deal before the trial.Yes, that's how I interpreted it. He's saying he felt Chauvin deserved to be convicted while recognizing that defendants are humans who make mistakes.
I keep wondering if more people would have sympathized with him if he had taken the stand and tried to explain himself. I wonder if he will make a statement or apologize to the family at his sentencing.
The point of taking the stand would have been to help his case.I meant the trial. It was the time to talk and explain - he pled innocence so why not fight for his goood name and reputation? During sentencing it will be "mustard after dinner" haha Besides it is not a good idea if he thinks about appeal. I should have written: He should have... English is not my mother tongue, I live on other continent in a far away country
I thought because she couldn't take her notes home she rewrote them at home from what she remembered that day.I did some googling and process varies...some are not allowed to take them out of courtroom including at the end of trial...some offer jurors the chance to take them with them at the end. I have to assume what Ms. Christensen is doing is okay with the court. I found it interesting how they had pick up spots in the morning and were driven to the government center. Also I guess I thought they had to deliberate in the courthouse but guess that was done at the hotel too.
I really don't know what the rule is in Minnesota but if someone really comes home after a day in court and rewrites notes that they already did in court that day then I think it is fair to say they intend to write some book or do extensive media outings.I thought because she couldn't take her notes home she rewrote them at home from what she remembered that day.
They spoke of a bunch of reports that have to be completed...not sure what all of that is.
I thought because she couldn't take her notes home she rewrote them at home from what she remembered that day.
Maybe.I really don't know what the rule is in Minnesota but if someone really comes home after a day in court and rewrites notes that they already did in court that day then I think it is fair to say they intend to write some book or do extensive media outings.