There is some very interesting "tidbits" posted on joy's new blog entry. However, I found myself a little geographically confused and was hoping for some clarification on these geographic concerns.
Joy states that at the time of the abduction there was another boy who lived on 91st. She states that on many occasions this boy took the same route to the tom thumb as jacob, and on one occasion the boy took a left on Baker street to head back home on 91st and was followed all the way home by a Pontiac 6000. She states that the Pontiac followed the boy all the way to his driveway and proceeded to park in the across the steer neighbors driveway with headlights on for 2 minutes, watching the boy as he entered his home. Later on in the blog joy states that boys property line butted up against the woods adjacent to delwin ballroom (which is on the northern part of 91st ave).
Taking all these geographic hints provided by Joy into consideration and using google maps as a visual aid, it would appear that the boy must have lived along the northern section of 91st avenue. However, the only property I see on google maps which somewhat butts against the woods adjacent to the delwin is the rassier farmstead. In fact, I dont see any properties along 91st other than the rassier farmstead, unless she is talking about the property on 295th street, which is a long way to the south of the delwin. Furthermore, I dont see any properties along 91st with a driveway directly across the street from a home. I conclude by stating that though the tidbits of info on joys blog are interesting, they do not follow any geographic logic.