MN MN - Madeline Jane Kingsbury, 26, mother of 2, Winona 31 Mar 2023

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
In Minnesota its very common. Most birthing centers offer the form to unmarried parents. It establishes a legal relationship between a man and a child when the man is not married to the child's mother. Signing a Recognition of Parentage is an easy and inexpensive alternative to getting a court order establishing the legal father.

ETA: A ROP does not give a father custody or parenting time (visitation). I believe that’s why AF has a case for custody at this time.
Thank you! I know this to be true too. It also helps the mom to get child support.
 
Court documents obtained by Fox News Digital and a law enforcement statement paint a different picture of what's happening behind the scenes in Winona, Minnesota.

"At one point, (Fravel) took the younger child into the residence and locked the door despite being told that the children were in the care and custody of Winona County," a petition filed April 4 by Winona County Health and Human Services just days after Kingsbury was last seen alleges

Further muddying the waters is an emailed statement by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA), which is assisting the Winona Police in Kingsbury's search, that said it's "not aware of any law enforcement advising Mr. Fravel not to attend news conferences or search(es) for Madeline."
 
He's definitely not going to get custody by refusing to give the kids to CPS during the investigation. I'm afraid that if more things come to light that point at the father that he will use those kids as a bargaining chip/hostage situation or he may actually kill them. People backed in to a corner will do desperate things. Does he still have the kids?
 
AF is lucky he didn't get arrested for obstruction when he locked the door on the social workers and refused to hand over the child.

The noose is tightening,

JMO
Then to put the kids in a vehicle was pretty odd to, what was he thinking? If he got that mad over them removing the kids, what would he have done to Maddi? Knowing she was going to move.
 
He's definitely not going to get custody by refusing to give the kids to CPS during the investigation. I'm afraid that if more things come to light that point at the father that he will use those kids as a bargaining chip/hostage situation or he may actually kill them. People backed in to a corner will do desperate things. Does he still have the kids?
No, he eventually put them in the car without any of their belongings (clothing, toys, etc.) from what has been reported. MOO

ETA: Madeline Kingsbury: Court docs, Minnesota police contradict claims from father
 
I am so relieved the children are safe with Maddi's family. As others have mentioned, the pressure is increasing on AF, and no one knows how how he might behave/react, especially when Maddi is found. It seems as though LE has been handling him in a certain way for good reason.

Where is Maddi? He didn't have that much time, they know where he drove, in general. Even if he may have "placed" Maddi somewhere temporarily, thinking he would move her at a later date, surely he realizes they are watching him, right? Surely they have searched his parents' property?? Its right off of Highway 43 .
 
According to a court petition, the Winona Police Department notified the Winona County Health and Human Services (WCHHS) on April 4 for a 72-hour hold on Maddi's children since her whereabouts are unknown and her disappearance may have been "Involuntary and suspicious."

Social workers and law enforcement officials tried to implement the 72-hour hold at Fravel’s parent's house, where the children were staying. However, Fravel and his family allegedly did not cooperate with officials and refused to permit social workers to meet with the children, according to the petition.
 
Then to put the kids in a vehicle was pretty odd to, what was he thinking? If he got that mad over them removing the kids, what would he have done to Maddi? Knowing she was going to move.
I took that part of the article as meaning AF put or help put the kids in the social workers car, but put the kids in the wrong car seats.

Which leaves me to wondering if the car seats were actually the car seats Maddi used for the kids or were the car seats already in the social workers car.

Was it stress of the moment that caused him to place the children in the wrong seats or lack of experience transporting them.

JMO
 
According to a court petition, the Winona Police Department notified the Winona County Health and Human Services (WCHHS) on April 4 for a 72-hour hold on Maddi's children since her whereabouts are unknown and her disappearance may have been "Involuntary and suspicious."

Social workers and law enforcement officials tried to implement the 72-hour hold at Fravel’s parent's house, where the children were staying. However, Fravel and his family allegedly did not cooperate with officials and refused to permit social workers to meet with the children, according to the petition.
From the article:

The case was brought before a judge on April 7 as an emergency protective care hearing and the judge issued a decision on April 12 that the children would not be released into Fravel’s care at this time.

"The children shall remain in their current placement at this time as it is in their best interest" and the "care, custody and control [of the children] is transferred to Winona County Health and Human Services," the order reads in part.

The WCHHS will determine visitation rights between the children and Fravel. The judge scheduled a pre-trial hearing on May 15 with a trial set for June 6.
 
From the article:

The case was brought before a judge on April 7 as an emergency protective care hearing and the judge issued a decision on April 12 that the children would not be released into Fravel’s care at this time.

"The children shall remain in their current placement at this time as it is in their best interest" and the "care, custody and control [of the children] is transferred to Winona County Health and Human Services," the order reads in part.

The WCHHS will determine visitation rights between the children and Fravel. The judge scheduled a pre-trial hearing on May 15 with a trial set for June 6.

The kids should be in the Witness Protection Program.
 
I'm not buying their timeline:

"requested residents along Highway 43 to check for any signs of disturbance or other suspicious activities between 8 a.m. on March 31 and 4 p.m. on April 1."

Did the kids actually see their mom on 31st, or did dad say 'she's not feeling good this morning and needs to sleep -- I'll take you to school today' - then drop them off where noone could see who was in the truck?

If so, it opens up the several hours before the kids woke up -- lots of time to move an already-deceased mom.

AFAIK this timeline is based solely on what dad said -- am I wrong?
 
I'm not buying their timeline:

"requested residents along Highway 43 to check for any signs of disturbance or other suspicious activities between 8 a.m. on March 31 and 4 p.m. on April 1."

Did the kids actually see their mom on 31st, or did dad say 'she's not feeling good this morning and needs to sleep -- I'll take you to school today' - then drop them off where noone could see who was in the truck?

If so, it opens up the several hours before the kids woke up -- lots of time to move an already-deceased mom.

AFAIK this timeline is based solely on what dad said -- am I wrong?
I would think a five year old could confirm who took her and her brother to daycare and if Mommy was "OK" at that time.

I'm sure the older child would have been interviewed.

JMO
 
In Minnesota its very common. Most birthing centers offer the form to unmarried parents. It establishes a legal relationship between a man and a child when the man is not married to the child's mother. Signing a Recognition of Parentage is an easy and inexpensive alternative to getting a court order establishing the legal father.

ETA: A ROP does not give a father custody or parenting time (visitation). I believe that’s why AF has a case for custody at this time.
As an attorney in this area, I’ve had a different experience as far as ROP frequency.

Either way, even if he establishes the legal relationship now, I don’t predict that he is going to be available to exercise much PT.
 
I'm not buying their timeline:

"requested residents along Highway 43 to check for any signs of disturbance or other suspicious activities between 8 a.m. on March 31 and 4 p.m. on April 1."

Did the kids actually see their mom on 31st, or did dad say 'she's not feeling good this morning and needs to sleep -- I'll take you to school today' - then drop them off where noone could see who was in the truck?

If so, it opens up the several hours before the kids woke up -- lots of time to move an already-deceased mom.

AFAIK this timeline is based solely on what dad said -- am I wrong?
I read today where one of the daycare employees said that both parents were seen and dropped off the children together on March 31st. So, yes, the children saw their mother. However, only the Dad came to pick them up.
 
From the article:

The case was brought before a judge on April 7 as an emergency protective care hearing and the judge issued a decision on April 12 that the children would not be released into Fravel’s care at this time.

"The children shall remain in their current placement at this time as it is in their best interest" and the "care, custody and control [of the children] is transferred to Winona County Health and Human Services," the order reads in part.

The WCHHS will determine visitation rights between the children and Fravel. The judge scheduled a pre-trial hearing on May 15 with a trial set for June 6.
Good, the court bought some time for the children which gives LE breathing space to continue investigating. In case the father has knowledge of what happened to Madeline it’s better for the children to be in a safe place. MOO
 
Since AF didn't have joint custody of the kids.To take one into the home & lock the door, swearing at officials besides. To go to court before a judge to attempt to get custody isn't going to be easy. He's not playing with a full deck. IMO
This may not be a fair judgment. To say he d didn’t have “joint custody” is comparing apples to oranges. AF and MK were not as yet separated physically. They were living together and by all accounts he had been living with and raising the children from birth. AF may have been completely blind-sided by this and not realized his custody was in question, having raised them as their father since birth. I can imagine if something happened to a partner be it accident or heart attack or what have you and CPS showed up to take your kids you would also be upset. That being said, I wonder if CPS only shows up in situations like this if there is another party asking for custody or making CPS aware of the situation. Not saying it’s inappropriate or I wouldn’t do the same thing if my family member was missing. Just saying I understand his anger/actions at his children being taken.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
168
Guests online
294
Total visitors
462

Forum statistics

Threads
609,139
Messages
18,250,043
Members
234,547
Latest member
4TheLost& Forgotten
Back
Top