Originally Posted by Ilovecookies
AB's bf? If he has one, we will never know of it.
emphasis added
Originally Posted by ynotdivein
emphasis added
ILC, I am wondering if that was a typo?
I think it was meant to read "Ab's boyfriend" not best friend.
First, I would like to state that I respect many a poster here, and I thank you for your warm welcome during the Nevaeh case
I, too, found myself with a couple days time-out
I may have replied and quoted someone looking for a birthdate for some initials related to the case with a generic "you are in the range", and I apologize for that (it would be helpful to know exactly why I had the time-out, and maybe I will find out now that I have apologized, Nanny
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
I understand that this case in particular has kept the mods busy)
I also apologize for having no period (key) on my laptop at this time
I have been catching up, and that is time above and beyond all of the reading I must do for a living in the last couple of days
Of course, the number of posts and poster increased tremendously in 3 days of this case, especially with local posters; although, ILC is who caught everyone's attention
(I admit I skip over at least 50% of posts with no factual information to add That leaves at least 50% of posts with no factual information to add that I do read, only because those posts are consistently quoted)
When I read mutliple posts consistently quoted, with no verifiable facts, I determine the crediblity by other factors, such as consistency of tone, language, audience consideration, and story! (Credibility has yet to be determined)
However, the original posts of ILC have been so frequently deleted, it is difficult to contextualize any of his statements
(Of course, I appreciate any insight into this American tragedy, and I am thankful for all posters, so thank you ILC! )
I suppose ILC bowed out because his "job is done" Which means that ILC served his initial purpose to defend and clear the names of the innocent parties in the killer's house
Okay, now I am ready to make a point: the names against all adults connected with the suspects' house are not "cleared" (unless our definition of clearing is washing hands of all adult responsiblity involved in caring for children) Yes, perhaps the four adults indirectly involved in a 9 year old child's murder are "in the clear," but in clearing the adults responsible for the 15 year old child, the information against the 15 year old
child suspect has been further clouded by this "first hand information" and an innocent victim's mother has been slandered by rumors of drug use and neglect
Anyone that reads through the last couple of days should easily spot all of the discrepencies posted, via second or third-hand biased hearsay
Clearly stated, I do not consider any adult in connection with this child an innocent party, as not that long ago someone petitioned for custody of children in MO courts
I am not sorry
Okay, ban me forever now