Is this a proven fact? JMO
It's been corroborated by numerous witnesses, including Johnson, IIRC :dunno:
Is this a proven fact? JMO
When Mark Furman was asked last night on Megan Kelly, have you ever seen a GJ being convened this quickly?
To which he replied. "Yes, in third world countries."
<sniped - read more>
Fox News Megyn Kelly & Confronts Pastor for Reversing Al Sharpton Criticism
White, though, said that he believes Officer Darren Wilson “is guilty.”
“He’s guilty of the unrest that has been caused by his actions,” he said, with Kelly pressing him to explain how he can be so sure. White continued, “Well, I know that because six shots, two to the head over an unarmed suspect who put his hands up.”
Kelly, though, vehemently disagreed.
“You cannot stand up and assert as fact as [Sharpton] did that Michael Brown posed no deadly threat,” she said. “If you had the answers, if Al Sharpton did, if the governor did, we wouldn’t need these 12 people to convene tomorrow and tell us whether this case should proceed.”
Watch the exchange below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKkbieKkliI
Is this a proven fact? JMO
Are you saying that if there is no indictment, the prosecutor is not doing his job?
If the prosecutor does NOT believe that there is probable cause that a crime was committed and that the crime was committed by the officer, he should NOT be seeking a Grand Jury indictment. Period. JMO
Catching up, I'm not sure if my original answer has been expanded on.
https://www.ohiobar.org/forpublic/resources/lawyoucanuse/pages/lawyoucanuse-86.aspx
BBM
This case will be interesting, b/c some of what a prosecutor typically relies upon to seek an indictment might actually absolve Wilson of any wrong doing. Forensics, autopsy, etc., etc., usually point toward guilt of the "defendant."