Hatfield
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 17,014
- Reaction score
- 59,129
In the overnight hours here in SE AZ we got an Amber Alert for a custodial mom and her kids based on a report that her EX felt she was a danger to herself and children... intending to park her car w/the kids on a railroad track. It was unfounded, but I'd venture to say that AA went out within a very short period of time after her EX contacted LE. Which tells me the system is skewed in the wrong direction. Mom drove to a local police station when she learned of the AA, and no charges are pending.
This is just JMO
I have to wonder if AA has lost some of its importance in some people's eyes due to custodial related AA versus cases like this.
This may just be a totally wrong assumption on my part. However, when I first heard about AA being created years ago, I first thought of how it would always be a critical situation like this case. As time went on , more and more of the AA I learned about were custodial cases and even though they can be just as critical and dangerous to the child it seems I end up putting them in a different type of bucket. For some reason I think of the custodial ones as not as critical or possibly not life ending to the child. Let me be clear that I know that can be totally wrong to think that.
Just wondering if others maybe making the same type of assumptions and maybe there should be levels of AAs like AA Level 1 and AA Level 2 so when we see AA Level 1 we know it is of the most severe nature where life hangs in the balance.
I hope I explained what i was trying to say and I totally understand that custody situations can also risk a childs life and some of those should be treated as AA Level 1.